It is âbeyond patheticâ, he writes in the book, that a phoney corporate hack like Trump should be able to present himself as the âchampion of the working classesâ, while the Democratic party stands back and cedes territory to him. He caricatures the Democratic promise to voters as, âWeâre pretty bad, but Republicans are worseâ, and warns that is simply not good enough.
Which brings us to Biden.
Sanders describes Biden, whom he has known since he was elected to the Senate in 2007, as a likable and decent man. But he has a clear message for the sitting president: step up to the plate or the future of the United States, of the world, is in peril. âThe challenge we face is to be able to show people that government in a democratic society can address their very serious needs. If we do that, we defeat Trump. If we do not, then we are the Weimar republic of the early 1930s.â
Mentions Bernie Sanders
MMT had been making inroads before the pandemic in terms of the number of lawmakers who were starting to ask whether they had gotten some big things wrong over the years. I was in meetings in Washington, DC, in February of 2020 with very high-level members of both the House and the Senate. This was leading up to the November 2020 election. So Iâm sitting there, and theyâre talking about the Trump administrationâs massive tax cuts, how they increase the deficit and the national debt, adding some $2 trillion to deficits with total disregard for the fiscal impacts.
This is what Republicans always do when they have power. They donât care about debt and deficits. They focus like a laser on passing their agenda. So they got their huge tax cuts passed.
Democrats fall for this story every time. When they get into power, they try to tighten the purse strings and say, âWeâre going to be good stewards of âtaxpayer moneyâ and try to avoid running deficitsâ and all that. Meanwhile, the Republicans never do that. They just use the deficit to pass their agenda.
Democrats had me come in and they said, âListen, we think weâve been misled about the risks of deficits. We donât think that these things are the bogeyman that weâve long been told, that itâs the road to ruin.â MMT had caused them to rethink these things.
US senators have defeated a measure, introduced by Bernie Sanders, that would have made military aid to Israel conditional on whether the Israeli government is violating human rights and international accords in its devastating war in Gaza.
A majority of senators struck down the proposal on Tuesday evening, with 72 voting to kill the measure, and 11 supporting it. Although Sandersâ effort was easily defeated, it was a notable test that reflected growing unease among Democrats over US support for Israel.
The measure was a first-of-its-kind tapping into a decades-old law that would require the US state department to, within 30 days, produce a report on whether the Israeli war effort in Gaza is violating human rights and international accords. If the administration failed to do so, US military aid to Israel, long assured without question, could be quickly halted.
Sen. Bernie Sanders was the lone member of the Senate Democratic caucus to oppose advancing a $110.5 billion supplemental foreign aid measure on Wednesday, expressing opposition to the bill's unconditional military assistance for the Israeli government.
"I voted NO on the foreign aid supplemental bill today for one reason," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement. "I do not believe that we should give the right-wing extremist Netanyahu government an additional $10.1 billion with no strings attached to continue their inhumane war against the Palestinian people."
"Israel has the absolute right to defend itself against the Hamas terrorists who attacked them on October 7," Sanders added. "They do not have the legal or moral right to kill thousands of innocent Palestinian men, women, and children."
After Joe Biden's apology for fond reminiscences of work with segregationist senators, uttered at a June 18 Manhattan fundraiser, the Bernie Sanders campaign is taking aim at another line by the former vice president that same night.
âWe may not want to demonize anybody who has made money,â Biden said that evening, per a pool report. âNobody has to be punished. No oneâs standard of living will change, nothing would fundamentally change. Because when we have income inequality as large as we have in the United States today, it brews and ferments political discord and basic revolution.â
In a Democratic primary season where "change" is the watchword for more than 20 Democrats seeking to challenge President Trump, Sandersâ presidential campaign has already weaponized Bidenâs words.