UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) Feed Items

Political Economy Considerations in Improving Compute Access for Public Interest Entities

 ā€” 
Source: charlesdeluvio onĀ Unsplash

By Sarosh Nagar and DavidĀ Eaves

Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) is perhaps one of the few things growing more quickly than the size of new AI models from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Central to this boom is ā€œcomputeā€ā€Šā€”ā€Šthe processing power, memory, and resources needed to perform the computations underlying AI systems. The worldā€™s compute is mostly concentrated within three American giantsā€Šā€”ā€ŠAmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, while in China, Tencent and Alibaba are formidable players.

How are dynamic capabilities conceptualized by city governments?

 ā€” 
Source: James Padolsey onĀ Unsplash

By RuthĀ Puttick

The Public Sector Capabilities Index explores if and how dynamic capabilities can be measured in a city government context. While the concept of dynamic capabilities has some history in private organizations, it is relatively nascent in the public sector, particularly at the urban level. Consequently, few individuals within city governments are familiar with the concept of dynamic capabilities. This unfamiliarity presents a dual challenge: it complicates the identification and measurement of dynamic capabilities in city government and makes it difficult to translate these findings into actionable insights for officials and practitioners.

The Problem

We know that some public sector activities are difficult to measure, or as Mintzberg putĀ it:

Capability building: Lessons for city government from emergency relief response

 ā€” 
Source: Shane Rounce onĀ Unsplash

By Ruth Puttick and FernandoĀ Monge

The Public Sector Capabilities Index is focused on identifying where city governments are strong and where certain capabilities need to be built up. Although it has a city government focus, we are keen to learn from parallel sectors and historical examples. Following our recent interview with Shaun Hazeldine, Head of the IFRC Solferino Academy, in this blog we explore lessons from its work to enable humanitarians to find creative solutions to complex challenges.

The Solferino Academy is the ā€œThink and Do Tankā€ that supports the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). Specializing in Innovation, Leadership and Strategic Foresight, the Solferino Academy supports the IFRCā€™s network of National Societies ā€œto transform and be fit for the challenges and opportunities of theĀ futureā€.

Data Exchange Systems as a foundational layer of digital government

 ā€” 
Source: Alina Grubnyak onĀ Unsplash

By David Eaves, Krisstina Rao and KassimĀ Vera

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) is an emerging term that describes a number of foundational capabilities that enable individuals to participate in society and markets as a citizen, entrepreneur, and consumer in a digital era. At the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), we define DPI as including digital payment systems, digital ID, and data exchange system(s) (DES). Each component plays a distinct role: digital payment systems facilitate financial transactions, digital IDs verify personal identity, and data exchange systems manage the secure flow of information across multiple platforms.

The Narrow Corridor and the Future of Digital Government

 ā€” 
Source: Tom Parkes onĀ Unsplash

By DavidĀ Eaves

A central dilemma for anyone interested in government is the dual nature of the state. On the one hand, the state can be a powerful force for goodā€Šā€”ā€Šharnessing and collectivising resources to create, or enforcing rules and norms that support, public goods. In this role, states have created miraculous outcomesā€Šā€”ā€Šsewage systems, public health and education, courtsā€¦ public goods that have radically improved peopleā€™s lives. On the other hand, the same Leviathan-like power that can make the state critical to creating public value also make it terrifying. The world is sadly filled with examples of states power used to displace, punish and terrorize marginalized communities, pursue wars of aggression, or simply eliminate dissent.

Capability Building in Government: What are the lessons from Blairā€™s Capability Reviews?

 ā€” 
Source: Benjamin Davies onĀ Unsplash

By RuthĀ Puttick

The UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) and Bloomberg Philanthropies are developing a Public Sector Capabilities Index. The aspiration is to measure where city government capabilities are strong and where skills must be built up. It will focus on city governments, but as part of its development, we are keen to learn from parallel sectors and historical attempts at capability building. This blog explores the public sector reforms and restructuring of government carried out by New Labour in theĀ UK.

What happened?

Civil service reform was a core component of ā€œNew Labourā€ during Tony Blairā€™s leadership from 1997 to 2007. During this time there were various initiatives, including the 1999 Modernising Government white paper, which aspired to create a ā€˜joined upā€™ government and ā€˜learning labsā€™ to promote public service innovation.

Driving change through the 2024 IIPP MOIN student placement programme

 ā€” 

By Nora Clinton, Head of the Mission-Oriented Innovation Network (MOIN), Institute for Innovation and Public PurposeĀ (IIPP)

At IIPPā€™s 2024 Rethinking the State Forum in June, many of our external guests from policy and academia commented on the dynamism of the Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose and its deep commitment to putting public value, how it is imagined and practiced, at the center of government and democratic discourse.

This dynamism emanates naturally from our highly committed researchers and academics; but increasingly it is IIPP students in our Masters in Public Administration (MPA) in Innovation, Public Policy and Public Value who are outstanding in theirĀ work.

What do we know about the state of DPI in the world? Preliminary insights from the DPI Map

 ā€” 

By David Eaves and Krisstina Rao

Last month (June of 2024), we launched the DPI Mapā€Šā€”ā€Šthe first comprehensive view of the state of digital identity, digital payments and data exchanges across theĀ world.

This work startedā€Šā€”ā€Šin partā€Šā€”ā€Šbecause there was little understanding of how many countries had adopted Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) around the world. Given the growing interest by policymakers, multilateral funders, public officials and public interests advocates, we hypothesized that a ā€œmapā€ of DPI could help create a baseline understanding of what is happening, and more importantly, help serve as a foundation for both future research and community on thisĀ topic.

And while early successes suggest that that hypothesis has been validated weā€™ve been so busy with outreach that weā€™ve not had much chance to share any emerging insights from the initial DPI map weā€™ve published. This blog post seeks to changeĀ that!

Caveats

Before we begin sharing the exciting insights weā€™ve gleaned so far, there are two important pieces of information toĀ share.

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) Map Launch

 ā€” 

By Krisstina Rao and MichaelĀ Chapman

The G20 Digital Economy Working Group and New Delhi declaration have drawn significant attention to the concept of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and made it a critical topic of discussion in international fora. Here at University College Londonā€™s Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), David Eaves and Jordan Sandman defined DPI as a set of digital capabilities that are essential for participation in modern society. Prominent examples of DPI include the Central Bank of Brazilā€™s Pix (instant payments), Indiaā€™s Aadhaar (digital ID), and the Estonia-led X-Road (data exchange layer). Others, such as the UNDP, have adopted similar or even broader definitions, often grounded in Brett Frischmannā€™s view of infrastructure as a ā€œshared means to manyĀ ends.ā€