The limited number of existing units, combined with low turnover rates, make co-op housing an unviable option for most Canadians, despite being so in-demand.
Consequently, since market landlords arenât competing against the affordability of co-op housing, they are free to jack rents as high as the market will bear, Thomas said. She points to pressure from industry lobbying the government against investing in non-market housing.
Geordie Dent, executive director of the Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations in Toronto, told Ricochet thatâs an accurate assessment of what happened behind the scenes, that lobbying by landlords certainly played a key role.
âI don't think anyone ever came out publicly and said that,â he said. âIt was always pitched as âmarket efficiencyâ to the public, while I think privately, a bunch of landlords realized they were going to make a ton of money down the road. The government just swallowed everything they said and they didn't care if it was true or not.â
Canada
People love living in co-ops â so why did Canada kill the program?
in RicochetB.C. Supreme Court rules against Vancouver groupâs challenge to supportive-housing project
in Global NewsThe proposed development will include 129 studio apartments for low-income people and those experiencing homelessness. A minimum of 50 per cent of units will be held for people who are currently homeless and on income assistance, with the other half for people earning earning between $15,000 and $30,000 per year.
More than 200 people signed up to speak to the cityâs public hearing, with emotions high on both sides. Opponents argued the project was a âfailed model of housing,â that would âwarehouseâ a high-proportion of proposed residents with complex issues. Opponents also raised concern about nearby schools.
Thursdayâs ruling un-pauses the original judicial review application against the city, which was suspended in September pending the outcome of the MEVA 5 challenge.
Homeowner politics and housing supply
in Journal of Urban EconomicsThis paper examines whether homeowner opposition to nearby housing development affects local councillorsâ votes on housing bills. Homeowners benefit financially from restricted housing supply through increased housing prices. City councillors, who approve housing development applications, cater to the needs of homeowners who are often long-term resident voters with a financial stake in neighbourhood amenity levels. Using data from Toronto, Canada from 2009 to 2020, we identify housing bills through a machine learning algorithm. We find that councillors who represent more homeowners oppose more housing bills. In particular, councillors are significantly more likely to oppose large housing developments if the project is within their own ward.
B.C. takes aim at short-term rentals with steeper fines, principal residence rule
in Vancouver SunThe B.C. government is taking aim at rule-breaking short term rental operators with a proposed law that would increase fines and ban most short-term rentals that arenât in the operatorâs principal residence.
The goal is to discourage landlords and investors from taking desperately needed suites off the long-term rental market by listing them on websites like Airbnb and VRBO. But housing officials acknowledge that almost 50 per cent of short-term rental operators are already flouting bylaws that exist in local communities.