A young colleague recently asked why, given the prevalence in society of gold bugs, crypto bros, and the like, the Finding the Money documentary didn't spend any time on arguing for the merits of chartalism over metallism (or some form of belief in commodity money).
Personally, I'd watch the hell out of a documentary logically working through the consequences of the currency monopolist's role as price setter, but I think I'd be in the minority there. I suspect most people would find it tiresomely arcane. In fact, allow me to demonstrate with what follows.
"The price level is necessarily a function of prices paid by the government’s agents when it spends, or collateral demanded when it lends.