A University of Copenhagen study discovered a strange phenomenon: the decision to buy a breed which has lots of health issues may in fact be deliberate. These dogs require care, and this in turn produces feelings of love and satisfaction in their carers. We stunt and cripple them in order to nurse them, in order to feel good about ourselves. Can this really be true? Well, it makes a warped sort of sense. Cuteness is what we often look for in dogs, particularly since the advent of social media. But this also means we select for creatures who, with their big heads, short legs or awkward bodies, give every appearance of being unable to fend for themselves.
[âŠ]
But itâs not just their bodies weâve bent out of shape. Weâve also messed up their minds. Studies of pet dogs find problems such as anxiety are rife. No wonder. The point of owning a dog is to make it emotionally dependent on you. [âŠ] But this dependence also subjects our pets to huge stress when left alone, or when they feel that you are displeased with them, or unhappy yourself.
[âŠ]
In a personal essay on the website Love Fraud, a woman writes about her sociopathic ex, and how his treatment of his dog mirrored his treatment of people he tried to manipulate. He loved teaching it tricks, she writes; he loved punishing it for bad behaviour, and most of all he loved its submissive, forgiving, dependent love for him. The pattern is that of the psychopath.
In The Guardian
Online, the idea that autism and ADHD can coexist is so widely accepted that it has spawned its own label â âAuDHDâ â and a groundswell of people who say they recognise its oxymoronic nature, perpetual internal war and rollercoaster of needs. There are tens of thousands of people in AuDHD self-help forums, and millions more watching AuDHD videos.
Some of those videos come from Samantha Stein, a British YouTuber. âThe fact that you can have both [autism and ADHD] at the same time is kind of paradoxical in nature,â she admits. âYou think: âHow can you be extremely rigid and need routines and structure, but also be completely incapable of maintaining a routine and structure?ââ
[âŠ]
Other AuDHDers give colourful analogies to describe the epiphany of diagnosis. Before the discovery, Iâm told, itâs as if you are trying to fit in and be a horse rather than celebrating the fact that youâre a zebra. Itâs like being trapped in a maze in the dark, then suddenly the lights are on and now thereâs a way to navigate out.
More than a dozen academics and students who spoke to Guardian Australia, most on the condition of anonymity, said the universitiesâ financial reliance on foreign students over many years had hollowed out academic integrity and threatened the international credibility of the sector.
Many said the rise of artificial intelligence was accelerating the crisis to the point where the only way to fail a course would be to hand nothing in, unless universities came up with a coherent institutional response.
A tutor in an arts subject at a leading sandstone university said in recent years the number of overseas students in her classes â who may pay up to $300,000 in upfront costs â had reached as high as 80%.
âMost canât speak, write or understand basic English,â she said. âThey use translators or text capture to translate the lectures and tutorials, translation aids to read the literature and ChatGPT to generate ideas.
âItâs mind blowing that you can walk away with a masterâs degree in a variety of subjects without being able to understand a sentence.â
Won't somebody think about the children? Well, in the face of certain poverty, at least all these kids won't be exposed to the vanishingly small risk of eventually regretting trans health care. F***ing hypocrites.
The Labour leadership has told you who it is, over and over again: it is time to believe it. Keir Starmer has suspended seven Labour MPs because they voted to overturn a Tory policy which imposes poverty on children. Sure, another tale will be spun: that by voting for the Scottish National partyâs amendment to abolish the two-child benefit cap, the seven undermined the unity of the parliamentary Labour party and were duly disciplined. But that is nonsense.
[âŠ]
It is hard to imagine Starmer is unaware of the fact that Osborne devised the policy to stoke public hostility towards and create a Victorian caricature of the undeserving, overbreeding poor. No decent society punishes children for choices they have not made and parents should not be punished for having more children. In Britain in 2024, kids turn up to schools with bowed legs and heart murmurs because of malnourishment, but a vast cost is also imposed on society as the scarring effect of poverty produces lasting lower productivity and employment levels.
Starmer knew this when he told the BBC almost exactly a year ago that he would retain this wicked Tory policy. He made the commitment to sound tough. Contrast with how he genuflects before powerful interests such as the Murdoch empire. By endorsing the two-child benefit cap, Starmer decided to gain partisan advantage, rather than fix an injustice afflicting his country. Party first, country second. Or rather, to be specific: playing politics with the lives of our most vulnerable children.
The general election did not allow for the full expression of people power. Rather, we saw a rejection of the political establishment, leading to a loveless landslide; this election saw the second-lowest turnout since 1918 and the smallest combined vote share for the two main parties since 1945. Public discontent with a broken political system will only grow as the government fails to make the real change that people expect.
That energy needs somewhere to go. It needs to be channelled. It needs to be mobilised. Thatâs why our campaign will organise with those who have been inspired by our victory to build community power in every corner of the country. Once our grassroots model has been replicated elsewhere, this can be the genesis of a new movement capable of challenging the stale two-party system. A movement that offers a real alternative to child poverty, inequality and endless war. A movement that provides a real opposition to the far right â one that doesnât concede ground to divisive rhetoric, but stands by its principles of anti-racism, equality and inclusion.
I have no doubt that this movement will eventually run in elections. However, to create a new, centralised party, based around the personality of one person, is to put the cart before the horse. Remember that only once strength is built from below can we challenge those at the top.
But it's okay, because "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM".
More than half a million UniSuper fund members went a week with no access to their superannuation accounts after a âone-of-a-kindâ Google Cloud âmisconfigurationâ led to the financial services providerâs private cloud account being deleted, Google and UniSuper have revealed.
Services began being restored for UniSuper customers on Thursday, more than a week after the system went offline. Investment account balances would reflect last weekâs figures and UniSuper said those would be updated as quickly as possible.
[âŠ]
In an extraordinary joint statement from Chun and the global CEO for Google Cloud, Thomas Kurian, the pair apologised to members for the outage, and said it had been âextremely frustrating and disappointingâ.
They said the outage was caused by a misconfiguration that resulted in UniSuperâs cloud account being deleted, something that had never happened to Google Cloud before.
Six councillors voted in favour. It beginsâŠ
A Sydney council has voted to place a blanket ban on same-sex parenting books from local libraries in a move the New South Wales government warns could be a breach of the stateâs Anti-Discrimination Act.
At a meeting last week, Cumberland city council in western Sydney voted on a new strategy for its eight council-run libraries.
The amendment, put forward by the former mayor and current councillor Steve Christou, proposed that the council take âimmediate actionâ to âridâ same-sex parents books and materials in its library service.
During the meeting, Christou brandished a book he alleged had received âreally disturbingâ constituent complaints, saying parents were âdistraughtâ to see the book, Same-Sex Parents by Holly Duhig, displayed on a shelf in the childrenâs section of the library.
The book, originally published in the UK, explores the experience of having two mums or two dads and features two men and a young child on the front cover.
Six councillors voted in favour of the amendment and five voted against, while four councillors were not present to vote.
âWeâre going to make it clear tonight that ⊠these kind of books, same-sex parents books, donât find their way to our kids,â Christou said during debate. âOur kids shouldnât be sexualised.
âThis community is a very religious community, a very family-orientated community.
âThey donât want such controversial issues going against their beliefs indoctrinated to their libraries. This is not Marrickville or Newtown, this is Cumberland city council.â
Christou said toddlers shouldnât be âexposedâ to same-sex content and that the proposed amendment was âfor the protection and safety of our childrenâ.
âHands off our kids,â he repeated.
Job providers are being paid millions of dollars in public money for work that jobseekers are finding themselves, with advocates saying there is âsimply no reasonâ for the payments.
The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations has paid providers more than $3.6m in the past five years for pre-existing employment, where someone on jobseeker found a job prior to starting with a provider, according to data provided to Guardian Australia by the department.
The data shows there has been an uptick in pre-existing employment payments, with providers receiving $1.1m in the 2023-2024 financial year, more than double the $464,200 paid in 2019-2020.
Tenants in one of Victoriaâs newest community housing blocks say they have gone weeks without being able to flush their toilets and months without being able to get a signal for TV, while their concerns over cracks in the building have gone unaddressed.
The $140m development in Dunlop Avenue in Ascot Value is the first development to open from the governmentâs Public Housing Renewal Program â now known as the Big Housing Build â and was heralded as the âmost advancedâ social housing project in the state when it was completed in March last year.
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
The estate was previously public housing, managed directly by the Victorian government. Since its redevelopment, the 200-dwelling complex offers only community housing managed by third-party not-for-profit provider Evolve and rent-controlled affordable housing.
But residents of the estate say they have had ongoing issues with the building management. One tenant says they have been served a notice to vacate twice in 12 months â and residents say their requests for maintenance are often ignored or take weeks to address.
This is spectacularly dysfunctional.
Itâs not just historic flats from Britainâs postwar housebuilding boom that are being sold. Brand new council houses are also going under the hammer, almost as fast as they are being built. Design blog Dezeen revealed this month that seven of Norwichâs newest council homes are already in the process of being sold off, fewer than five years after they were completed. Other authorities have also been forced to sell their new council homes, such as Hackney in east London, which has already lost some of the social housing it built in Stoke Newington in 2018.
Despite right to buy being so destructive to public finances that it has been abolished in Scotland and Wales, Labour has announced it will keep Thatcherâs policy if it wins the next general election. This U-turn, backtracking on the partyâs previous two manifestos, which promised to suspend sell-offs, has bitterly disappointed many local politicians who are desperate for change.
[âŠ]
Itâs hardly surprising most councils are not building many homes at all, given they are obliged to sell them at a discount almost as soon as the paint is dry. Would you spend hundreds of thousands of pounds building a new house to rent out if your tenants could force you to flog it to them for less than it cost to construct, just three years later? According to research from UCL, right to buy âremains the major disincentive to local authorities building more social rent homesâ as the majority of councils rightly fear the policy will impact any new housing developments they undertake.
Instead, many authorities have launched schemes to cling on to as much of their remaining stock as possible. Some offer grants to incentivise council tenants to buy on the open market instead of via right to buy. Wandsworth, in south-west London, for instance, will chip in up to ÂŁ120,000 towards helping their tenants purchase a home âwithin the UK or anywhere else in the worldâ, provided it is not a council property.