The political stoking of the spate of antisemitic hate crime scenario, which was concurrently being debunked by admissions from law enforcement in the same reports, staff at the Daily Telegraph concocted the idea for a report that it had entitled âUndercover Jewâ in its internal documentation, and it involved a man wearing an Israeli flag cap being sent into various situations.
Israeli Australian man Ofir Birenbaum was employed by the Murdoch rag to be the undercover Jew, wearing a Star of David on his cap, as well as video glasses to record the incident, although the known provocateur has since denied he was recording footage. And what occurred in Enmore at the Cairo Takeaway was set to be repeated in various suburbs throughout Greater Sydney.
The idea was simple, send Birenbaum into the café to provoke an antisemitic response, as the Cairo Takeaway openly displays its support for Palestine on the side of its building, via a Scott Marsh mural.
So, the Jewish man entered the café, ordered at the counter and then received no derision or ridicule, although a staff member did follow him out of the premises as he left, only to find a Daily Telegraph journalist and two camerapeople waiting outside.
This discovery has only served to support suspicions that these incidents are being manufactured to convey a community riddled with antisemitism. The Murdoch scenario serves as a domestic example of what the federal police consider may be orchestrated by foreign actors paying locals to commit the crimes. And it further serves to leave the public suspicious of the authorities.
Linkage
Things Katy is reading.
Politicians Are Curtailing Liberties and Chastising the Public Over Contrived Antisemitism
for Sydney Criminal LawyersAI Personality Extraction from Faces: Labor Market Implications
The stupid use cases for AI just keep coming:
Human capital---encompassing cognitive skills and personality traits---is critical for labor market success, yet the personality component remains difficult to measure at scale. Leveraging advances in artificial intelligence and comprehensive LinkedIn microdata, we extract the Big 5 personality traits from facial images of 96,000 MBA graduates, and demonstrate that this novel ``Photo Big 5'' predicts school rank, compensation, job seniority, industry choice, job transitions, and career advancement. Using administrative records from top-tier MBA programs, we find that the Photo Big 5 exhibits only modest correlations with cognitive measures like GPA and standardized test scores, yet offers comparable incremental predictive power for labor outcomes. Unlike traditional survey-based personality measures, the Photo Big 5 is readily accessible and potentially less susceptible to manipulation, making it suitable for wide adoption in academic research and hiring processes. However, its use in labor market screening raises ethical concerns regarding statistical discrimination and individual autonomy
Debanked by the Market
in Credit SlipsCertain industriesâe.g., adult websites, guns-and-ammo, gaming, bail bonds, and lawyers (!)âtend to have higher chargeback rates. These industries are often served by a subset of banks that specialize in high-risk payment processing. Crypto companies also fall into that category of having high chargeback rates, but the chargeback risk posed by crypto is fundamentally different. Chargeback risk is manageable when it is predictable, but that requires that it be uncorrelated. Lots of happily married men might claim they did not authorize that purchase OnlyFans subscription, but they aren't all making that claim suddenly and at the same time. The chargeback level if high, but basically static and predictable.
Crypto doesn't work like that. Although there is probably always a relatively high baseline level of chargebacks for crypto, the chargebacks are also likely to be highly correlated whenever there is a market crash or allegations of fraud about a particular coin. If the market goes up, everyone is happy with their transactions, but when it falls, customers try to get out of their losses by claiming that the purchase was never authorized in the first place. Now Visa has a 120 day time limit for issuers to chargeback transactions to acquirers, so the acquirer has to worry about market movements in a completely unpredictable market for the next four months. If say, Bitcoin crashes, chargebacks are going to soar at the very time when the risk of the crypto company customer going bankruptcy rises. So the scenario that the payment processor is facing is that it will be hit with a tidal wave of chargebacks and that it will not be able to recover them from the crypto company, but will instead just have an unsecured claim in the crypto company's bankruptcy.
Google is on the Wrong Side of History
for Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)Google continues to show us why it chose to abandon its old motto of âDonât Be Evil,â as it becomes more and more enmeshed with the military-industrial complex. Most recently, Google has removed four key points from its AI principles. Specifically, it previously read that the company would not pursue AI applications involving (1) weapons, (2) surveillance, (3) technologies that âcause or are likely to cause overall harm,â and (4) technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.
Those principles are gone now.
In its place, the company has written that âdemocraciesâ should lead in AI development and companies should work together with governments âto create AI that protects people, promotes global growth, and supports national security.â This could mean that the provider of the worldâs largest search engineâthe tool most people use to uncover the best apple pie recipes and to find out what time their favorite coffee shop closesâcould be in the business of creating AI-based weapons systems and leveraging its considerable computing power for surveillance.
The Austerity Politics of White Supremacy
in Dissent MagazineWhile the opponents of Reconstruction were painting themselves as staid and respectable fiscal conservatives, they were simultaneously engaged in a radical plan to subvert democratic elections across the South. In principle, the Redeemersâ open campaign of voter suppression, political intimidation, and violence risked further federal intervention, but the North was losing the will to defend black political freedom. In fact, wealthy Northernersâeven those who had been strongly anti-slaveryâbegan doubting the logic of universal male suffrage as it empowered the immigrant working class in their cities. The political identity of the âtaxpayerâ was born in this reaction to black freedom and working-class political power, and it has existed ever since to oppose the specter of a multiracial working-class alliance.
Called together by the Charleston Chamber of Commerce and the Charleston Board of Trade, the Tax-Payersâ Convention of South Carolina met in Columbia in May 1871 and again in February 1874 to seek, âfor the holders of property and the payers of taxes, a voice and a representation in the councils of that State.â They had a duty to speak up, the Tax-Payers argued, because the state of South Carolina was suffering from âthe fearful and unnecessary increase of the public debtâ; âwild, reckless and profligateâ spending; and âexcessive taxation.â
[âŠ]
Emphatic color-blindness was, to say the least, a recent development in the public rhetoric of South Carolinaâs white elite. As recently as 1868, a number of Tax-Payers had signed a petition to the U.S. Congress, entitled a âRespectful Remonstrance on Behalf of the White People of South Carolina,â that opposed black male suffrage because âthe superior race is to be made subservient to the inferior.â Porter himself had argued that black people had âtraits, intellectual and moral,â and âcredulous naturesâ that left them with an âincapacityâ to rule.
At their Tax-Payersâ Conventions, however, these same men, despite sporadic remarks on the ânegro character,â no longer officially identified themselves as advocates on behalf of the white race; they were simply representatives of the âover-burthened tax-payers.â This self-appointed role was ironic: as slaveholders, the Southern elite had done everything in their power to cripple the tax capacity of both their states and the federal government. Now, the South Carolina Tax-Payers called into question the right of black people and poor whites to govern because they believed these voters did not pay a substantial amount of taxes. âThey who lay the taxes do not pay them, and that they who are to pay them have no voice in the laying of them,â Porter asserted, wondering if âa greater wrong or greater tyranny in republican governmentâ could be conceived.
[âŠ]
It is no coincidence that when the Jim Crow laws were finally dismantled, the reaction to the civil rights movement once again featured paeans to âthe taxpayerâ and a new wave of tax limitations. The rhetoric of the taxpayer is readymade to call into question the right of black and poor Americans to participate in or benefit from their government. The taxpayer was the foil to Reaganâs welfare queen, who he claimed had a âtax-free cash incomeâ of $150,000 a year. Reaganâs story was a fictionâheâd change the numbers from speech to speechâbut that hardly mattered. Talking about taxes allowed voters to put a dollar figure on their resentments, and to experience the poverty of others as persecution.
The End of Days Inn
For over half a century, Trump has operated within a transnational organized crime network whose goal is to strip the US down and sell it for parts, much like the oligarch raids after the collapse of the Soviet Union. They have been aided in this endeavor by institutions, in particular the DOJ, which has long protected Trump, and by members of the Democratic Party serving as controlled opposition.
Many Americans did not want to believe this final twist. It is harder to reckon with betrayal than with a straight liar.
But the footage of a grinning Joe Biden with Donald Trump â the man who Biden claimed is a fascist who will destroy America and then handed the keys to the country, promising to accommodate him â seems to have finally woken folks up.
I warned you for nine years, because I wanted you to be prepared. Biden was a Placeholder President designed to fill the four years between two terms of Trump while plutocrats shifted American political culture sharply to the right. Media gutted, Twitter decimated, activism destroyed, books censored, minorities demonized, public health annihilated, victims blamed, empathy scorned.
That is the main thing they are after now: your empathy. They want you to hate each other so you donât hate them first.
They want you to buy into every cheap cliché and every manipulated poll. They want you to hate each other so much, you agree to their plan of tearing this country into warring fiefdoms for oligarchs to plunder. They want you to prey on the vulnerable, even though you are vulnerable too, so that the powerful can escape scrutiny.
They want you to cheer your own demise, mistaking it for someone elseâs.
I'm genetically male
for YouTubeWanted to share something very important and personal to raise awareness and hopefully help someone whoâs struggling with similar feelings I felt back when I was diagnosed as intersex.
Why Was Hitler Elected?
Nazism is a kind of âauthoritarian populism.â Populism is a political ideology that posits that politics is a conflict between two kinds of people: a real people whose concerns and beliefs are legitimate, moral, and true; a corrupt, out-of-touch, illegitimate elite who are parasitic on the real people. Populism is always anti-pluralist: there is only one real people, and they are in perfect agreement about everything. (Muller says populism is âa moralized form of antipluralismâ 20).
Populism become authoritarian when the narrative that the real people have become so oppressed by the âeliteâ that they are in danger of extermination. At that point, there are no constraints on the behavior of populists or their leaders. This rejection of what are called âliberal normsâ (not in the American sense of âliberalâ but the political theory one) such as fairness, change from within, deliberation, transparent and consistent legal processes is the moment that a populist movement becomes authoritarian (and Machiavellian).
[âŠ]
Authoritarian populism always has an intriguing mix of victimhood, heroism, strength, and whining. Somehow whining about how oppressed âwe areâ and what meany-meany-bo-beanies They are is seen as strength. And that is what much of Hitlerâs rhetoric wasâso very, very much whining.
And that is something else that authoritarian populism promises: a promise of never being held morally accountable, as long as you are a loyal (even fanatical) member of the in-group (the real people).
In authoritarian populism, the morality comes from group membership, and the values the group claims to haveâvalues which might have literally nothing to do with whatever policies they enact or ways they behave.
Your brain works fine when you're under 25 (no matter how 'inconvenient' this fact may be)
Basically, far too many people have seen descriptors like ânot fully developedâ and taken that to mean itâs like a partially assembled Ikea bookshelf; a work in progress, something that will be able to do itâs job when itâs done, but not until thenâ.
Thatâs not how brains work, though. At every stage of development, theyâre âfunctionalâ. Young brains allow us to walk, speak, perceive, connect, deduce, calculate, coordinate, decide, respond, focus, retain, and all the other stuff your standard human brain does all day every day to successfully navigate our increasingly complex world.
[âŠ]
Why do people insist otherwise? Unclear. But itâs not based on any particular scientific study or claim. At best, it seems to be a corruption/misunderstanding of a few older studies into brain development, ones which mentioned, or only used subjects under the age of, 25. But didnât make any grand claims about this being some developmental cut-off point, or the moment when your brain dings like a microwave, to let you know that itâs âdoneâ.
[âŠ]
Letâs be clear; more often than not, anyone invoking the âpeople under 25 years old donât have functional brainsâ argument, is doing so to support their position or beliefs, whatever they may be.
Thatâs why someone can be deemed too young to understand the decision to, say, get an abortion, and simultaneously be declared mature enough to have and raise a baby.
Or young men under 25 can be âtoo youngâ to be expected to stop themselves from committing crimes like sexual assault, but are definitely old enough to receive the full adult punishment for joining a terrorist organisation, or entering another country by non-legal means. And so on.
Mirroring Trump, Peter Dutton takes aim at diversity and inclusion workforce
Mr Dutton's incendiary speech â his first major statement of the year â sets up a direct clash and contrast to Anthony Albanese who is campaigning for re-election by celebrating Labor's efforts to expand the nation's "care economy" and boost services to the elderly, families with young children, and people with disabilities.
In addition the opposition leader's promise to dismantle the role of "culture, diversity and inclusion" advisers seeks to mirror Donald Trump's successful political campaign in last year's US presidential race when he took aim at what are known in the US as diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
[âŠ]
Describing the federal bureaucracy's growth under Labor as a "completely unsustainable economic situation", Mr Dutton said he would deploy newly appointed shadow for government efficiency Jacinta Price to help "scale back the Canberra public service in a responsible way".
Senator Price has also vowed to review funding for Welcome to Country ceremonies.