Sounds familiar, in practical effect at least.
Most Vancouver renters were long ago priced out of the detached home market. Then they were priced out of the condo market. And now, the cityâs zoning laws mandate that most new rental housing gets built in undesirable locations, unfairly exposing apartment-dwellers to the increased health risks that come from living on busy, arterial roads.
One of the legitimate purposes of zoning is to separate incompatible uses: to keep noxious factories and their emissions as far away from peopleâs homes and lungs as possible, for example. But zoning that bans apartments anywhere except busy streets does the opposite: it boosts the number of people exposed to health risks. On top of that, because renters typically have lower-incomes than owners, those increased risks fall disproportionately on those with less.
Thereâs a deeper political dynamic here, one that former Vancouver City Councilor Gordon Price has called The Grand Bargain:
From Expo 86 to the 2010 Olympics [Vancouver] has accommodated growth pressures on a small fraction of the cityâs land, while avoiding the political unpleasantness of significant rezonings in built-out neighbourhoods, whether on the West Side, the East Side or even the West End.
Under this Grand Bargain, new housing is concentrated on busy streets, or on old industrial sites, while little to no change is permitted in neighborhoods of detached homes