Awash in vehicle data, most car manufacturers, or OEMsâoriginal equipment manufacturersâfound themselves in an unfamiliar role. âWhat has given rise to the industry is that most OEMs have recognized that they are better at making cars than they are at processing and handling data,â said Andrew Jackson, research director at PTOLEMUS Consulting Group, which studies the connected vehicle industry.
This created an opening for a new kind of third-party data company, vehicle data hubs, which are at the center of the connected vehicle data market.
[âŠ]
Andrea Amico is founder and CEO of Privacy4Cars, an automotive data privacy company. Amico said of vehicle data hubs, âSo, thereâs many sources out there. Their business proposition is collect all this data, create massive databases, try to standardize this data as much as possible and then literally sell it. So thatâs their business model.â
Linkage
Things Katy is reading.
Who Is Collecting Data from Your Car?
in The MarkupExtremism definition: a deep dive into authoritarianism to lay cover for the Tories aiding Israelâs genocide
in The CanaryAs Michael Gove launched his preposterous and dangerous new extremism definition, some of the groups he targeted have hit back â calling it a âdeep dive into authoritarianismâ and laying cover for the government âaiding and abettingâ Israelâs genocide in Gaza.
Marking the Webâs 35th Birthday: An Open Letter
for World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)There are two clear, connected issues to address. The first is the extent of power concentration, which contradicts the decentralised spirit I originally envisioned. This has segmented the web, with a fight to keep users hooked on one platform to optimise profit through the passive observation of content. This exploitative business model is particularly grave in this year of elections that could unravel political turmoil. Compounding this issue is the second, the personal data market that has exploited peopleâs time and data with the creation of deep profiles that allow for targeted advertising and ultimately control over the information people are fed.
How has this happened? Leadership, hindered by a lack of diversity, has steered away from a tool for public good and one that is instead subject to capitalist forces resulting in monopolisation. Governance, which should correct for this, has failed to do so, with regulatory measures being outstripped by the rapid development of innovation, leading to a widening gap between technological advancements and effective oversight.
The future hinges on our ability to both reform the current system and create a new one that genuinely serves the best interests of humanity. To achieve this, we must break down data silos to encourage collaboration, create market conditions in which a diversity of options thrive to fuel creativity, and shift away from polarising content to an environment shaped by a diversity of voices and perspectives that nurture empathy and understanding.
Australian immigration detaineesâ lives controlled by secret rating system developed by Serco
in The GuardianThe lives of detainees in Australiaâs immigration detention centres are controlled by a secret rating system that is opaque and often riddled with errors, a Guardian investigation has found.
Developed by Serco, the company tasked with running Australiaâs immigration detention network, the Security Risk Assessment Tool â or SRAT â is meant to determine whether someone is low, medium, high or extreme risk for factors such as escape or violence.
Detainees are also rated for an overall placement and escort risk â which may determine how they are treated while being transported, such as whether they are placed in handcuffs and where they stay inside a detention centre â but arenât given the opportunity to challenge their rating, and typically are not even told it exists.
Immigration insiders, advocates and former detainees have told Guardian Australia the SRAT and similar algorithmic tools used in Australiaâs immigration system are âabusiveâ and âunscientificâ. Multiple government reports have found that assessments can be littered with inaccuracies â with devastating consequences.
Claims of Mass Rape by Hamas Unravel Upon Investigation
in Yes! MagazineContent Warning: The â wholly fabricated, it appears â subject matter of this piece is stomach-churning.
Following Hamasâ Oct. 7 attacks that resulted in at least 1,163 deaths, rumors began circulating that Israeli women were experiencing horrific mass rape and sexual violence. Months later, a position paper by Physicians for Human Rights Israel and a New York Times investigation convinced many observers that Hamas used rape as a weapon of war. But an investigation by YES! examining both reports, other media investigations, hundreds of news articles, interviews with Israeli sources, and photo and video evidence reveals a shocking conclusion: There is no evidence mass rape occurred.
The New Yorker, New York Times, Associated Press, and The Nation treat PHRIâs paper as the gold standard for proof of Hamasâ rape and sexual violence. But the paper is shockingly thin. It lacks original reporting and is based on media reports that are dubious at best with no corroborationâno forensic evidence, no survivor testimony, no video evidence.
âIâm homeâ: how co-operative housing could take pressure off Australiaâs housing crisis
in The ConversationWhile only a small provider of accommodation in Australia (0.03% of all homes compared to Swedenâs 22%), new research reveals how developing the sector could relieve some of the pressure.
[âŠ]
Tenant-members expressed high levels of satisfaction with their living arrangements, a strong sense of home, solid social bonds, and an improved sense of health and wellbeing. These positives were shared with their children.
Importantly, our study found participants had a strong sense of agency and voice, which is often missing in other housing tenures, especially renting.
State of Hate 2024
for Hope Not HateThis yearâs State of HATE report focuses heavily on the Radical Right, a political phenomenon we define as right-wing populist in outlook, with strongly anti-immigration and anti-elite rhetoric, but differs from the traditional far right in that it advocates an illiberal democracy rather than overthrow of the system itself.
JK Rowling Holocaust Denialism: Author Pushes Claims That Trans People Were Not A Target
On Wednesday, J.K. Rowling implicitly denied that transgender individuals were targeted and that books about them were burned in Nazi Germany. This assertion contradicts abundant evidence that transgender people were among the first targeted by the Nazis' rise to power in Germany. This culminated in the looting of the Magnus Hirschfeld Institute of Sexology and the infamous burning of the initial decades of transgender healthcare research, as well as the internment, forced detransition, and murder of transgender citizens. When confronted with numerous scholarly sources, she instead linked to another thread that labeled the first transgender patient a "troubled male.â
The claims emerged after Rowling argued that doctors providing gender affirming care to transgender youth should face prison time. She also advocated for imprisoning leaders of Stonewall and Mermaids, charities serving transgender and queer individuals. Recently, the author has adopted more extreme positions regarding transgender people, including describing a prominent transgender woman and journalist in the United Kingdom as "A manâŠcosplaying."
Rinehart-backed Arafura gets $840m in taxpayer aid for NT project
in Australian Financial ReviewStupid, stupid, stupid.
The Albanese government is supercharging its push to break Chinaâs stranglehold on global critical minerals supply with an $840 million package of loans and grants to help Gina Rinehart-backed Arafura Rare Earths develop its Northern Territory mine and refinery.
The support is Laborâs biggest single financial commitment for the critical minerals sector and effectively expands federal taxpayersâ exposure to rare earths mining and processing by more than 50 per cent to well over $2 billion.
UK ministers and officials to be banned from contact with groups labelled extremist
in The GuardianMinisters and civil servants will be banned from talking to or funding organisations that undermine âthe UKâs system of liberal parliamentary democracyâ, under a new definition of extremism criticised by the governmentâs terror watchdog and Muslim community groups.
Michael Gove, the communities secretary, will tell MPs on Thursday that officials should consider whether a group maintains âpublic confidence in governmentâ before working with it.
Groups that will be effectively cancelled by ministers for falling foul of the new definition will be named in the coming weeks, government sources said.
There will be no appeals process if a group is labelled as extremist, it is understood, and groups will instead be expected to challenge a ministerial decision in the courts.