The extraordinary analysis reveals more than a third of what Australians hand over to energy giants AGL and Origin for electricity is pure profit for the companies.

The research – which crunches the companies’ own data – reveals $755 of what an average AGL electricity customer forks out each year goes directly to profit for the company, which made more than a billion dollars last year.

Origin electricity customers pump $595 a year into the company’s annual profit, which was more than $2 billion last year.

It’s a similar story with gas. The average Origin customer pours $417.57 into the company’s annual profit. $414.04 of what an average AGL gas customer hands over each year is pure profit for the company.

The discussion paper, by The Australia Institute’s Senior Research Fellow David Richardson, also reveals that households are massively subsidising the bills of big businesses, with consumers paying more than double what businesses pay for a megawatt hour of electricity or gigajoule of gas.

Key findings:

This interview is also available on podcast platforms and Rumble.

The Reserve Bank of Australia had a great opportunity to give Australians – and the nation’s sluggish economy – something both desperately needed before Christmas.

But, once again, the RBA has failed.

By leaving interest rates on hold at 4.35%, the Reserve Bank has failed to do what is right for Australians.

It has failed to do what is right for the economy.

And it has failed to learn from its own mistakes.

Australians have suffered unnecessarily for too long. Cutting interest rates would have eased that suffering. Cutting interest rates would have provided some sensible stimulus to an economy which has almost ground to a halt.

“The RBA’s interest rate settings have smashed households and smashed businesses,” said Greg Jericho, Chief Economist at The Australia Institute.

“Headline inflation is within the bank’s target band. What is it waiting for?

“Last year’s review of the Reserve Bank criticised it for keeping rates on hold for 30 meetings in a row, when a rate cut would have stimulated a stagnating economy. It’s happening again.

“An interest rate cut today would not have been an act of Christmas goodwill. It would have been an act of common sense.

“Now, thanks to the RBA, many Australian families face an unnecessarily bleak Christmas.”

Digital Rights Advocate, Kate Bower

In October, I had the pleasure of seeing national security analyst, Dr Miah Hammond-Errey speak on a panel about mis- and dis-information at this year’s SXSW Sydney. I was impressed with her nuanced and informed take on the topic and how she described the data-extractive business models of digital platforms as key to understanding and therefore tackling mis- and dis-information. It aligned strongly with our thinking at Digital Rights Watch, that we need to disrupt the business models of Big Tech and digital platforms, rather than rely on content moderation as a solution to the mis- and dis-information problem, and the best way to do that is by strong and meaningful reform of our privacy law. In this interview, Miah reflects on the unlikely pairing of national security and privacy, the role of human rights and how we might regulate Big Tech.

Kate: Your background is in intelligence and national security, how did you become interested in privacy?

Miah: It is a good question! As a national security analyst, I am perhaps an unexpected privacy advocate. The short answer is that I had the luxury of analysing technology and security for my PhD and leadership roles and recognised that without addressing privacy vulnerabilities we cannot resolve the security vulnerabilities either.

Author and former speechwriter Don Watson joins Dr Emma Shortis on After America to discuss what Trump’s re-emergence reveals about the United States and how Australia might respond differently to a second Trump administration.

This discussion was recorded on Monday 9 December 2024 and things may have changed since recording.

Order What’s the Big Idea? 32 Big Ideas for a Better Australia now, via the Australia Institute website.

Guest: Don Watson, author of ‘High Noon: Trump, Harris and America on the Brink’

Host: Emma Shortis, Director, International & Security Affairs, the Australia Institute // @EmmaShortis

Show notes:

Donald Trump’s Meet the Press interview (December 2024)

‘High Noon: Trump, Harris and America on the Brink’ by Don Watson, Quarterly Essay (September 2024)

‘The Second Coming’ by Fintan O’Toole, NY Review of Books (December 2024)

Theme music: Blue Dot Sessions

Last year, scientists warned that the Maugean skate – a stingray-like marine animal dating back to the dinosaur era – was heading for extinction.

The Minister is now considering two separate reviews which will decide whether the skate survives – or becomes extinct.

The reason the skate is facing extinction is because, in 2012, the salmon industry was allowed to undertake a massive expansion of fish farms in Macquarie Harbour, the Maugean skate’s only habitat. One third of the Harbour is part of the Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area and the skate is one of its natural values.

Pollution from these large, foreign-owned fish farms has led to severely depleted oxygen levels in the harbour’s waters.

Now, the powerful salmon lobby – grossly exaggerating its importance to the local economy – wants to be exempt from environmental laws.

A newspaper advertisement promoting the petition states: “The salmon industry in Tasmania is owned by three foreign corporations, including JBS, which has been convicted of corruption. None of their salmon farms have paid company tax in Australia since 2019 according to Australian Tax Office data.”

“Australians are not stupid. They are starting to see through the lies and spin of these powerful multinational corporations,” said Eloise Carr, Director, The Australia Institute Tasmania.

“Now we need Australians to ensure their politicians don’t fall for the misinformation being spread by these corporations pillaging Australian waters.

Have the US election results and the rise of the tech broligarchy got you worried about the morbid symptoms of global patriarchy?

This week, Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek decided not to reconsider the environmental impacts of three coal mines, mines that are almost big enough to swallow Sydney whole.

Owned by BHP, Mitsubishi and other multinational corporations, these mines will impact koalas, gliders and many other threatened species.

Minister Plibersek’s decision was not surprising.

The Environment Council of Central Queensland had previously asked her to reconsider other coal mines. She reconsidered … and then approved the mines anyway.

That decision set up the embarrassing situation of Australia’s Environment Minister fighting in court to approve coal mines, alongside mining companies against environment groups.

To be clear, when the Environment Minister had to choose a side – coal companies or the environment – she chose coal companies.

And there’s plenty more in the coal companies’ stockings.

Research out this week from The Australia Institute shows that the NSW government spends five times more money promoting coal than it has budgeted for helping mining communities’ transition away from coal.

The state’s four regional “Future Jobs and Investment Authorities” are supposed to “support communities reliant on the coal industry to secure their long-term economic future as the global demand for coal declines over time”.

These authorities have a combined initial budget of just $5.2 million and a promise of more money in 2028.

A fascinating biography of one of Australia’s most respected and well-regarded politicians.

An idealist as well as a pragmatist, and someone who believes passionately in equality, democracy and empowerment, Race Mathews has inspired and mentored many.

Race was principal private secretary to Gough Whitlam in the lead-up to Whitlam’s election as prime minister, then an MP in the Whitlam government, and later served in the Victorian  Government as Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Arts, and Minister for Community Services.

Race Mathews: A Life in Politics is the biography of a politician, academic, author and reformer, tracing the life of Race from childhood and his political awakenings to working for fellow Fabian and great mentor, Gough Whitlam, in ‘the most tumultuous, and by far the most rewarding’ time of his career. His key successes include helping to develop policies on education and Medibank (later Medicare), conducting a major review of the police force, gun control, improving disaster management after the 1983 Ash Wednesday bushfires, opening the Arts Centre on Southbank and establishing the Melbourne Writers’ Festival.

Drawing on a memoir Race began, but did not finish, and interviews, articles, speeches, books and her own diaries, Iola Mathews, journalist, author and Race’s partner for over fifty years, provides personal insight into the life and work of one of our most highly respected politicians. Watch the recording of the event below.

The federal government must prioritise ending Australia’s massive social housing shortfall, Everybody’s Home said, as a new report reveals housing stress is the fastest growing main factor triggering homelessness.

This year’s Australian Homelessness Monitor reports a 36 percent rise in new service users citing housing affordability stress as their primary reason for seeking support from homelessness services in the three years to 2023-24.

The research by UNSW in partnership with Homelessness Australia also found that in recent years, the risk of homelessness has been affecting a broader range of people, with an increasing proportion of workers seeking crisis support.

Everybody’s Home spokesperson Maiy Azize said: “Australia’s worsening housing crisis is fueling the rise in homelessness. People simply cannot afford insanely high rents week after week – it’s pushing many into housing stress, leading them to sleep in cars or improvised dwellings, and on couches or the streets.

Instead of learning from the review they seem determined to repeat it. Meanwhile Australians suffer from an economy with higher interest payments, higher unemployment and more people struggling.

Before they make their decision on interest rates on Tuesday, the Reserve Bank board should read the RBA review, particularly where it criticised them for not reducing interest rates from 2016 to 2019. Back then, inflation was outside the RBA’s target band of 2% to 3% but, unlike today, it was not too high but too low. Inflation was less than 2% for almost that entire period.

Given the high rates of inflation over the last two and half years you might think, what’s the problem with low inflation? Isn’t inflation bad?

While high inflation can cause problems, so does low inflation. Low inflation means the economy is stagnating. It is a sign that it is not growing as fast as it could and because of that unemployment is higher than it needs to be. The correct monetary policy response to inflation being below the target band is to cut interest rates and stimulate the economy.

But back in 2016, rather than cut, the RBA kept rates on hold for a record 30 consecutive meetings. The longest period in RBA history. The review was scathing, saying this was responsible for approximately 270,000 additional people being out of work for a year.

So why didn’t the RBA cut rates?

It’s because they keep getting the link between unemployment and inflation wrong.

Subscribe now

Text Originally posted Dec, 04, 2024

by Valorie Van-Dieman

photography by Piper Bly

They spoke of freedom and pain, of respect and discrimination on this frigid Wednesday outside the U.S. Supreme Court. They talked about the lives that have been saved, the people who have thrived and the individuals who continue to live with uncertainty and apprehension. 

And time and again, they spoke of the urgency of the moment. 

Hundreds of trans people, relatives and allies gathered outside the courthouse in the nation’s capital while the justices heard oral arguments in U.S. v Skrmetti, a case that will decide the fate of health care for trans youth in Tennessee and beyond. Anti-trans advocates thronged the court as well.

Here is what they had to say:

Sorry to harp about bathrooms lately, but we’ve got a win this time!

Salmon companies are ripping off Tasmania and trying to pass it off as yet another ‘jobs vs environment’ fight. This is the kind of fight that Tasmanian politicians love to have, and like performing seals, the Tasmanian government and opposition have lined up to bark and do their tricks.

But the fight over salmon farming is different. All three major companies are owned by multinational corporations. Tassal is owned by a major Canadian company and Petuna is owned by a Japanese-New Zealand corporation. The third main salmon company in Tasmania, Huon, is owned by JBS. JBS is a Brazilian corporation infamous for corruption. JBS’s bribery of Brazilian politicians played a big part in its expansion and its arrival in Tasmania.

These corporations literally want Tasmanians to accept their crap.

To be more precise, the poo and other discharge from salmon farms in Macquarie Harbour generates the same amount of nitrogen pollution as sewage discharged by a city of half a million people – that’s more than double Hobart’s.

Dumping the equivalent of two Hobart’s worth of sewage in a World Heritage-listed harbour has consequences. And the best-known is the impact on the Maugean skate, a stingray-like creature that has been around since the dinosaurs and lives nowhere else in the world.

Extinction bells have been tolling for some time for the skate. Scientific advice to the Australian Government is unequivocal that salmon farming is the key threat to its survival.

New polling from The Australia Institute reveals that although Aussies love giving gifts, much of what we buy will spend years in the back of a cupboard and, ultimately, end up in landfill.

So, while it might be a season of joy, it’s also the season of waste, which is bad for the environment and bad for the hip pocket.

The Australia Institute surveyed 1,009 Australians between 13 and 15 November 2024 on issues relating to gift giving, consumption and spending habits during Christmas time. The margin of error is ±3%.

Key Findings:

Australians waste more than $1 billion on buying Christmas gifts for people that don’t get used.

Nearly one in two Australians (47%) do not think about how the gifts they buy for others will eventually be disposed of.

Over three in four Australians (77%) like buying gifts for people at Christmas, but over half of Australians (52%) would prefer it if people did not buy them gifts at Christmas.

A greater number of Australians buy gift wrapping paper (69%) than gift bags (52%). However, gift bags are more likely to be reused (65% of those who use gift bags reuse them) than wrapping paper (24% of those who use wrapping paper reuse it).

Nearly two in three Australians (64%) agree that it is better for the economy when people buy fewer things that don’t get used.

A 2022 paper digs into the inherent joy that comes with being transgender.

An interview with Chris Geidner of Law Dork about what he thinks happened at oral arguments in US vs Skrmetti and whether journalists should smooth the way for the high court to uphold bans on gender-affirming care for youth.

Mary Amiti, Matthieu Gomez, Sang Hoon Kong, and David E. Weinstein

Pavlos Roufos is a Greek political economist living in Berlin. He has a PhD in political science from Kassel University. He works on central banks, constitutional law and European integration from the 1920s to today, with a special emphasis on the Eurozone crisis. You can find his newsletter "The End of Times" here

AI-enabled goods and services are now commonplace in the Australian market and people interact with AI-enabled products in their daily lives. These products range from entirely online digital products, such as subscription streaming services for entertainment and customer service chatbots, to internet-connected physical goods such as digital assistants in smart phones and smart speakers, to internet-of-things goods that have little to no human interactivity, such as robot vacuums. 

AI-enabled products present unique challenges to consumers’ ability to participate fairly and safely in the market and enact their consumer rights using the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The largest challenge is the opacity of AI and algorithms, making it difficult for individuals to assess whether a good or service meets the consumer guarantees of acceptable quality and fitness for purpose. Consumers understand there is a problem when  a toaster doesn’t toast, however it’s near impossible for everyday people to assess the quality and efficacy of AI-enabled products, making it equally impossible to seek remedy using the ACL. 

In the broader context of digital markets, in which AI-enabled products exist, practices of deceptive design, unfairness and manipulation should be addressed through economy-wide provisions. As such, DRW supports the introduction of a prohibition on unfair trading and refer to the work of consumer groups such as CHOICE and Consumer Policy Research Centre for further elucidation of the benefits of an unfair trading ban.