This article was read by Eunice Wong. You can find her work at www.eunicewong.actor.
Text originally published September 12, 2026.
Teen Takeovers Are a Legacy of Woke 1.0
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —“Teen takeovers” have gone from a social-media spectacle to a serious public-safety issue. While the name conjures images of high schoolers innocently hanging around a drive-in à la American Graffiti, at its core, this phenomenon is about sowing violence and chaos—and leaving communities to deal with the consequences.
The 2026 Wisconsin State Fair concluded its final evening with a massive brawl, during which violent “teens” swarmed the park and beat unassuming fair guests. One man was kicked and beaten as he lay in the fetal position. Earlier this summer, a teen takeover at a Chipotle in Washington, D.C., forced frightened patrons to scramble as youths began throwing chairs and screaming.
In cities across the nation, the same pattern of brutality has emerged: swarms of young, primarily black teenagers will suddenly invade a public space to fight, threaten police, destroy private property, and occasionally get involved in shootings.
Current ScholarshipThe political economy of venture capital: winners-take-all and founder control
— Organisation: Just Money —Terminal Profits: Carney’s Push to Privatize Canada’s Airports
— Publication: Perspectives Journal —Prime Minister Mark Carney announced his government’s intention to privatize Canada’s airports at the Canada Investment Summit convened in Toronto on September 15, 2026. The Summit brought together CEOs and financiers from around the world to raise capital financing for so-called “nation building” major projects across Canada in commodities, trade and digital infrastructure.
Airport privatization was also one of the major announcements made at the Summit, and it appears to have raised the eyebrows of many, including those in the travel industry, among government caucus members, and among Canada’s labour unions. With precise timing, the week before this Investment Summit announcement, the Canadian Labour Congress released a new report entitled: Public Runways, Private Profits: Why Airport Privatization Would be Risky and Costly for Canadians.
We need to talk about big tech | Between the Lines
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —From our CEOs – with Leanne Minshull
One of the best things about working at the Australia Institute is the range of policy issues we get to tackle.
Over the past fortnight, I have been focused on Australia’s pathway out of fossil fuels.
The Australia Institute hosted Tuvalu’s Minister for Climate Change and Environment Hon. Dr Mania Talia, at our fourth annual Climate Integrity Summit. He was joined by Canadian Senator Hon. Rosa Galvez, a driving force behind the global parliamentary network for phasing out fossil fuels.
The following day, Dr Talia and Senator Galvez joined our colleague Louise Morris to meet federal members of parliament. Their message was direct – for Tuvalu, the consequences of burning fossil fuels are not an abstract debate about emissions targets. They are a question of survival. And the consequences are being felt around the world.
While all of this was happening, another group of Australia Institute colleagues, led by our new Director of Corporate Regulation, Josh Bornstein, was tackling another rapidly changing threat – Big Tech.
On 8 September, the federal government released the exposure draft of its Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026.
The Bill contains four major elements:
The “Trump Effect” on Immigration Is Real
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —When the definitive history of Joe Biden’s presidency is written, it will likely conclude that his most important legacy was unprecedented immigration levels. The U.S. foreign-born population (legal and illegal) grew by 8.3 million during his time in office, driven mostly by the border crisis that he instigated.
At first, the media called the massive influx “seasonal” or blamed it on pent-up demand after COVID lockdowns. Later, they claimed that every Western country faced a similar situation. Many argued it was inevitable. As David Bier of the Cato Institute argued in the New York Times, “Biden Can’t Stop Immigration. Time to Embrace It.” Of course, nothing about it was inevitable.
Testimony Opening Statement to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics
— Organisation: Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) —A shocking number of Australians on Jobseeker are dying – it doesn’t have to be this way
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —On this episode of Dollars & Sense, Greg and Elinor discuss the shocking number of Australians dying on Jobseeker, the government’s immigration policy announcements, and why inequality is a political choice. Then, a bittersweet Dollars & Sense announcement.
This discussion was recorded on Thursday 17 September 2026.
More Fool Me: How the gas industry tricked Australia by Richard Denniss, the latest Vantage Point essay from Australia Institute Press, is available now.
Use the code ‘FOOLME’ on a four-edition Vantage Point subscription to receive a free copy of Richard’s book, Econobabble.
Host: Greg Jericho, Chief Economist, the Australia Institute // @grogsgamut
Host: Elinor Johnston-Leek, Senior Content Producer, the Australia Institute // @elinorjohnstonleek
Show notes:
The Next Election May be Our Last - Read by Eunice Wong
— —This article was read by Eunice Wong. You can find her work at www.eunicewong.actor.
Text originally published August 31, 2026.
Uncovered: Administrative State Abuses of Military Contracts | The American Mind Podcast
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —The American Mind’s podcast is a weekly conversation with Ryan Williams, Spencer Klavan, and Mike Sabo devoted to uncovering the ideas and principles that drive American political life. Stream here or download from your favorite podcast host.
Uncovered: Administrative State Abuses of Military Contracts | The American Mind Podcast
In this special episode, Will Thibeau, director of the Claremont Institute’s American Military Project, sits down with Claremont president Ryan P. Williams to discuss his recent report on the 8(a) Program, its unique weaponization in the Woke Era, and how the military under Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is combatting the rampant abuses. Plus: What can America’s industrial base learn from the Iran and Ukraine wars?
The post Uncovered: Administrative State Abuses of Military Contracts | The American Mind Podcast appeared first on The American Mind.
Catechizing the Bots
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the “monster” begins as a creature whose maker abdicates his catechetical responsibility. Victor Frankenstein spends nearly two years learning how to give life to an inanimate body. But at the moment of success, when the creature finally opens his eyes, Victor is overcome with disgust and abandons him without teaching him a word.
Spoiler: the creature receives an education anyway. He leaves Victor’s apartment functionally newborn and learns about his environment through direct experiences with hunger, pain, fear, and the elements. The monster eventually takes refuge in a hovel joined to the De Lacey family’s cottage, where he witnesses examples of familial virtue. He learns history and social order from Volney’s Ruins of Empires and draws on Plutarch, Goethe, and Milton to form his understanding of himself, society, and God. The creature’s education is accidental and ungoverned: no one chooses his curriculum, corrects his errors, or even knows he is listening.
Australia built an illness system, not a health system
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —On this episode of Follow the Money, Dr Luke Slawomirski and Matt Grudnoff join Ebony Bennett to discuss the soaring cost of specialists, why pushing people towards the private health system doesn’t take pressure off public hospitals, the government’s proposed changes to private health rebates, and how to ensure Australia doesn’t backslide towards US-style health care.
This episode was recorded on Tuesday 15 September.
Correction: During the discussion on Australian specialist costs, Luke mistakenly said that average costs in the Australian Capital Territory are six times higher than Tasmania. They are actually four times higher.
More Fool Me: How the gas industry tricked Australia by Richard Denniss, the latest edition in the Vantage Point series, is available now.
Use the code ‘FOOLME’ on a four-edition Vantage Point subscription to receive a free copy of Richard’s book, Econobabble.
Guest: Luke Slawomirski, Senior Postdoctoral Research Fellow, the Australia Institute // @lukeslawomirski
100 organisations unite to defend Australia’s anti-discrimination laws
— Organisation: Equality Australia —16 Sept 2026 – One hundred women’s organisations, LGBTIQ+ groups, unions, disability groups and mental health advocates have united to oppose proposals to redefine ‘sex’ under Australia’s anti-discrimination laws, warning that doing so would put longstanding protections for trans and intersex people, as well as women, at risk.
The letter comes a day after a Coalition Bill seeking to rewrite the Sex Discrimination Act (SDA) was voted down in the Senate for the second time.
Similar attempts to amend the Act have also been made by a Nationals MP and One Nation.
The open letter was signed by organisations including the Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS), Australian Multicultural Women's Alliance (AMWA), Victorian Trades Hall Council, Australian Services Union, Fair Agenda, ACON, National Foundation for Australian Women, Women With Disabilities Australia, Equality Australia, Women's Electoral Lobby and Women's Legal Services Australia.
Sent to all federal MPs, the letter urges them to reject any changes that would redefine “sex” in the SDA or remove gender identity as a protected attribute, warning that such changes would undermine essenital protections against discrimination.
The Democrats’ Identity Trap
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —On August 21, 2024, I rolled into the Indiana Dunes at the end of an 825-mile bicycle ride from Washington, D.C.—a ride that raised over $100,000 for I AM ALS, founded by former Obama White House counsel Brian Wallach. Two days before my arrival, Wallach was just a few miles away in Chicago, addressing the Democratic National Convention (DNC) alongside his wife, Sandra.
Also inside that convention hall was one of the party’s most prolific progressive fundraisers, a woman named Evan Barker. Her recent loud break with the Democratic Party, overnight as it looked, had been a long time coming. She walked out during Oprah Winfrey’s speech, recorded a video on the convention floor, and posted it to TikTok, garnering millions of views. After the 2024 election, she wrote an essay for The Free Press admitting she’d voted for Donald Trump.
Alberta’s Democratic Dissatisfaction and the Separatist Moment
— Publication: Perspectives Journal —While the movement for Alberta separatism may be framed as a straightforward push for independence, the concerns driving it raise a more nuanced question – do Albertans truly want to leave Canada, or are there real issues of democracy, influence, and autonomy over policies that decide the province’s future? Despite the loud rhetoric calling for independence, recent polling has suggested that support for independence remains a minority position. In February 2026, the Angus Reid Institute found that 30% of Albertans would vote to leave Canada in a referendum, compared with 65 % who would vote to remain. A March 2026 Leger survey similarly found only 17% supported independence, though 58% of Albertans were concerned about the growing momentum of this movement.
Weak support for separatism should not be dismissed. Pollara’s Alberta Spotlight tracking put separatist support at 27% in April 2026, its highest level in five years of its own tracking. While still a minority view, separatism has increasingly become a way for Albertans to express dissatisfaction with Canadian politics.
I Wandered Lonely in The Cloud
— —In his 1807 poem, “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”, William Wordsworth wrote about the time he touched grass.
Out on a lonesome stroll, Wordworth’s spirits were lifted by the sight of thousands of “dancing daffodils” near a sparkling lake. The flowers were so striking that they birthed in him a new serenity. “The inward eye is the bliss of solitude,” he proclaimed, marveling that quiet contemplation could return him to fleeting joy.
Whatever came, Wordsworth would have his inward eye. He wrote an ode to memory.
Today our memories are stolen by oligarchs. They drain our lakes of daffodils to build data centers for storing them. You can never have true solitude in a surveillance state. You cannot wander lonely in The Cloud: you are always watched but never seen.
Technofascists want to shut the inward eye. They’ll close it like an eyelid on a corpse: a gambit, a formality. They want it shut for all eternity. Eternity is no big thing: the future is an asset they hoarded long ago. Loneliness is all that oligarchs will give you for free. Loneliness without solitude: the ultimate totalitarian win.
Longlist for the 2026 Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Journal Article Prize
— Publication: Progress in Political Economy —The selection committee for the Australian International Political Economy Network (AIPEN) Richard Higgott Journal Article Prize is pleased to announce the articles nominated by AIPEN members for the longlist for the 2026 prize.
The prize will be awarded to the best article published in 2025 (online early or in print) in international political economy (IPE) by Australia-based academic(s). The prize defines IPE in a pluralist sense to include the political economy of security, geography, literature, sociology, anthropology, post-coloniality, gender, finance, trade, regional studies, development, and economic theory, in ways that can span concerns for in/security, poverty, inequality, sustainability, exploitation, deprivation, and discrimination.
The overall prize winner will be decided by the selection committee, which is comprised of AIPEN members and this year includes Ainsley Elbra, Anja Bless, Elliot Dolan-Evans, Tim DiMuzio, and me. Before that decision can be made, we now invite AIPEN members to vote on the longlist to establish the final shortlist of four articles for deliberation.
Voting is being conducted online through ElectionBuddy and is open to all members of the AIPEN e-list. Voting is open from 9am on Monday 21 September (AEST) and closes 5pm on Friday 9 October (AEDT).
The Household in The Hierarchy of Finance in a Capitalist Economy (Part One)
— — Publication: Notes on the Crisis —
This is a premium Notes on the Crises article. Subscribe here to read in full.
With this piece, we accomplish our first “lap” through the tripartite structure of this series. This is how I plan to write the entire series, with maybe some small deviations. I am trying to build up from basic foundations, which going one category at a time wouldn’t accomplish. It wouldn’t make sense, for example, to get to credit derivatives before even having a basic discussion of what a limited liability corporation is. As readers can probably tell, I’m quite excited about this approach to building up from the basics. Gradually increasing the complexity of the instruments, criteria and the organizational forms seems to me to be quite an intuitive way from going from confusion over the basics of finance to becoming conversant in mortgage backed securities and beyond.
Vale – The Honourable Mary Gaudron KC
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —The Australia Institute is deeply saddened to hear of the passing of the Honourable Mary Gaudron KC.
Mary was the first woman judge on the High Court of Australia. She successfully argued the 1972 Equal Pay Case, with the Arbitration Commission concluding women have the right to “equal pay for work of equal value”. In her joint decision with Justice William Deane on the Mabo case, Gaudron wrote powerfully of the dispossession of Indigenous Australians from their land as “the darkest aspect of the history of this nation. The nation as a whole must remain diminished unless and until there is an acknowledgment of, and retreat from, those past injustices.”
As a member of the Australia Institute’s National Integrity Committee from 2020-2023, Mary made the case for effective anti-corruption watchdogs – invested with the powers needed to root out serious and systemic corruption.
Mary and her colleagues were ultimately successful when the Parliament passed the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act in 2022 – although the NACC remains restricted in its ability to hold public inquiries.
Our thoughts are with Mary’s family and loved ones.
Marsha Blackburn: Doubling Down on More of the Same
— —America’s “shocking” access to Australian bases, revealed
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —On this episode of After America, Dr Richard Tanter joins Dr Emma Shortis to discuss his new research on American access to Australian defence facilities, the long-term consequences of the war on terror for the Australia-US alliance, and whether Australia is the only American ally not seriously rethinking its relationship with the United States.
This episode was recorded on Friday 11 September.
Join Emma and Allan Behm for the Melbourne launch of Allan’s new book, New Game New Rules: A foreign policy for dystopian times at 6pm on Tuesday 22 September.
Tickets to ‘The Last Best Hope of Earth: Reflections on the USA at 250’ at the Celtic Club in Melbourne on Friday 18 September are available here.
Guest: Richard Tanter, Senior Research Associate, Nautilus Institute
Host: Emma Shortis, Director, International & Security Affairs, the Australia Institute // @emmashortis
Show notes:
Alberta’s Electricity Deregulation and Data Centre Gamble
— Publication: Perspectives Journal —This article is published alongside a companion article in Jacobin tracing how deregulation, not data center growth itself, has driven up American electricity prices — a framework applied here to Alberta’s own data centre boom.
Tug of War
— —Foreword: This is going to be an unusually personal Stained Glass Woman article. All the science is still there, but it also speaks to my life a little more immediately than most. Unlike most Stained Glass Woman articles, the anecdote about my life won’t just be at the beginning.
Additionally, while I usually don’t link research that’s paywalled in Stained Glass Woman, there’s simply no way around doing so for this article, because most of psychology’s most important work only exists in pay-to-access journals.
What’s Behind the Rise of Euthanasia in the West?
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —On July 14—Bastille Day—the French national team lost its semi-final match against Spain at the FIFA World Cup. The very next day, France’s National Assembly voted to legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia, providing a humane way out for those who could not stomach the bitter taste of defeat.
Putting aside the dark humor of the timing, France finds itself in good company now that it has legalized medical practices commonly described as “euthanasia” that actively and intentionally terminate human life. These practices are distinct from those in which a medical professional contributes to the end of a patient’s life either passively (for example, by withholding life-sustaining treatments at the patient’s request) or unintentionally (for example, by administering sedatives with the intention of easing pain, even when there is a risk of hastening death as a side effect).
What’s the point of data centres?
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —On this episode of What’s the Point?, Richard Denniss examines Australia’s artificial intelligence boom and the political fight over who reaps the rewards.
This episode was recorded on Friday 4 September.
More Fool Me: How the gas industry tricked Australia by Richard Denniss, the latest Vantage Point essay from Australia Institute Press, is available now.
Use the code ‘FOOLME’ on a four-edition Vantage Point subscription to receive a free copy of Richard’s book, Econobabble.
Read more on The Point.
Host: Richard Denniss, co-Chief Executive Officer, the Australia Institute // @richarddenniss
Producer: Anna Chang, Managing Editor, The Point // @annachang
Show notes:
COVID- not TikTok- is disabling young women
— —Last week, The Telegraph published an article titled, “How having a disability became cool,” with the subhead, “Young women, nicknamed ‘sickfluencers’, are turning chronic illness into a lifestyle trend and entrenching a culture of economic inactivity.”
This article serves a political purpose.
It shores up the government narrative that rising rates of disability are being driven, not by the ongoing and unchecked spread of COVID, but by people just deciding they want to “identify as disabled”.
This claim is absurd on its face.
Let’s dive in.
Social media is part of the issue, but the problem is sexist views already exist
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —A series of sexual assault cases perpetrated by teenage boys have rocked the country in recent weeks, prompting a national discussion about how to tackle rising misogyny fuelled by toxic manosphere content. But it has also revealed that misogynistic attitudes are just as likely to be found in the national parliament as they are in any Australian school or workplace.
In the space of a few weeks, three 17-year-old boys were charged with the alleged gang rape of a 17-year-old girl in Sydney, three private school boys from The Scots College were charged with the alleged sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl, while Victorian police are investigating an alleged sexual assault at Melbourne hotel where the Sydney Swans were staying – though no Swans players have been charged. NSW Police are also investigating the death of a 16-year-old girl in Sydney after it was suspected she was choked by her partner during sex.
Message to PM: Digital Duty of Care laws don’t go far enough to keep Australians safe
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —In an open letter published in newspapers today, organisations representing a broad cross-section of Australian society say the proposed laws should be strengthened to allow Australians harmed by illegal and dangerous online content to take action to enforce the Duty of Care.
“Social media companies facilitate an enormous range of harm, including psychological illness, sexual violence, body dysmorphia and eating disorders, human trafficking, hate speech directed at vulnerable communities, racist violence, fraud, political insurrection and genocide,” the letter states.
“While we welcome the introduction of a Digital Duty of Care, the current plan gives eSafety, the regulator, a monopoly on enforcement,” said Josh Bornstein, Director, Corporate Regulation at The Australia Institute.
“The regulator already receives more than 100,000 complaints a year and can only take action for a tiny percentage of that number. No regulator can police online safety on its own. Australians who are harmed by Big Tech should also be allowed to seek redress for a breach of the Digital Duty of Care.”
The open letter is supported by groups including the Chinese Australian Forum, the Australian Education Union, the Working with Women Alliance, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and The Australia Institute.
The tide has turned against big tech’s harm
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —The myriad laws on Australian statute books addressing these serious harms do not elicit shouty cries of “free speech”.
Yet a misconceived claim of censorship is the hill that One Nation and the Coalition are choosing to die on in opposing the Albanese’s government’s plan for a new legislated digital duty of care – a law that would apply to those same harms.
Pauline Hanson set out her opposition, posting: “Australia should be moving away from government censorship, not building the Orwellian machinery for it”.
Hanson’s post came just days after she demanded enhanced security because she has received violent threats. Presumably Hanson doesn’t regard those threats as a form of free speech.
A YouGov poll of more than 1000 Australians also shows that the conservative parties’ opposition to regulating Big Tech is deeply unpopular with the electorate. A staggering 93 per cent of Australians agree that online platforms should be required to provide a safe online environment that prevents illegal and harmful content.
A Far-Right International Is Assaulting Democracy
— —The Escalating Crisis in Canada-US Trade Negotiations: An Explainer
— Publication: Perspectives Journal —With the collapse of 2026 US-Canada trade negotiations in August and the implementation of counter-tariffs by Prime Minister Mark Carney in early September, Canadians are left wondering what happened and what comes next. Perspectives Journal editor Clement Nocos spoke to Daniel Drache, political economist and Professor Emeritus of Political Science at York University, for an explainer on the escalating crisis.
This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.
Clement Nocos: Prime Minister Mark Carney promised to deliver a trade deal with the United States with much of his “elbows up” campaign rhetoric, but this has since spiralled as the US escalates its tariffs and Canada imposes retaliatory measures. What stands out about the collapse of interim trade deal negotiations meant to in August 2026 that were meant as a stop gap in place of CUSMA’s renewal?
The Heavy Yoke of 9/11
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —Twenty-five years ago this morning, 2,977 people were murdered in the space of 102 minutes. Most of them had gone to work. Some had boarded an airplane. Among them were 343 New York City firemen who climbed the stairs of the World Trade Center towers while everyone else came down, knowing what that act meant. Aboard a plane over Pennsylvania, 40 passengers and crew learned by telephone what was happening and took their plane back from the men who had seized it.
We memorialize them, as we should. But a quarter century is long enough that we owe them something more than memory. We owe them an accounting. The honest question on this anniversary is not whether we honored the dead. That we have done. It is whether we have ever understood what had been done to us and why—and whether the American people have been made safer or left exposed in ways their forefathers would have found unthinkable.
In Natural Right and History, the political philosopher Leo Strauss opens by asking whether the United States, having become the world’s most powerful and prosperous nation by adhering to the principles of the Declaration of Independence, still held those truths to be self-evident.
America’s Youth Still Need Charlie Kirk
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —One year ago today, America lost Charlie Kirk.
In some ways, it feels like only yesterday. At other times, it feels like a lifetime ago. Twelve months after that horrifying day, we have only begun to reckon with the scale of the loss for conservatism—and for America.
To someone who ignores politics, it can be hard to explain just why Charlie’s loss was so great. He had a popular podcast—but there are many of those. He did campus debates—but he didn’t have a monopoly on that concept. And of course, however deeply involved in politics he was, Charlie never held office himself.
And yet millions think that Charlie Kirk’s martyrdom leaves a tremendous void on the Right. Why?
What America lost one year ago on that dreadful September 10 was not merely a debater, a pundit, an activist, or even, as many speculated, a future president. What America lost was a true leader, the kind who comes along only a few times in a generation.
The American Way
In one of the most important passages in Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville describes the tremendous capacity for self-organization among America’s citizens, in contrast to the torpor he saw among the people of Europe:
Remembering Charlie Kirk, One Year Later
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —It is hard to believe that a year has passed since Charlie’s assassination.
Paying fitting tribute to his life’s work is daunting, and I have been hesitant to write anything at all—especially when I think of his wife, Erika, and their children. None of us can fathom what they have endured.
But we must keep Charlie’s life and work alive in memory and let them inspire and inform our own.
Prudence is an old word with a venerable tradition in Western thought and politics, though its full meaning has grown obscure in modern times. It is also the virtue I most associate with Charlie—and the one we would do best to learn from as we continue to fight for the country he loved.
Charlie was a principled man, but he was no ideological fanatic and no dogmatist on questions of politics and policy. He was always reading, learning, and talking with Americans from every walk of life: college students, grassroots conservatives, the donor class, and leaders across the country.
Today's Census News is a Big Deal
— —
tl;dr: "American democracy depends on the census. Trump is undermining it" is my new op-ed at the Guardian. Check it out!
For census geeks, this summer has been one eeeek after another. Planks of the Jenga tower keep getting pulled out. First, the White House announced that the Census Bureau must stop using sophisticated techniques to protect the public's confidentiality; they were told to go back to the 1960s and suppress data or round. The result will be less data, less quality data, and/or less privacy. It's bad all around. We are starting to see the impact: critical data has been delayed.
Political Fallout: Charlie Kirk’s Legacy and “The Flight 93 Election” | The American Mind Podcast
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —The American Mind’s podcast is a weekly conversation with Ryan Williams, Spencer Klavan, and Mike Sabo devoted to uncovering the ideas and principles that drive American political life. Stream here or download from your favorite podcast host.
Political Fallout: Charlie Kirk’s Legacy and “The Flight 93 Election” | The American Mind Podcast
Policy to ‘save’ forests so bad it split the Greens
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —Today’s decision by the Greens to support a new method of carbon offsetting in publicly-owned forests is “fiddling while the forest burns”, according to Dr Richard Denniss, co-CEO of The Australia Institute.
Green’s leader, Senator Larissa Waters, indicated her party would vote with the government this afternoon to allow a new ‘method’ to increase the supply of carbon credits. However, three Greens Senators say they’ll cross the floor to support the disallowance motion.
“The task of stopping Australia’s expansion of coal and gas is going to become a little harder today,” said Dr Denniss.
“In voting with Labor, the Greens have shown they now support putting publicly-owned forests into the ‘carbon marketplace’, and have tied the protection of trees and koalas to the expansion of gas and coal.
“Native forests are one of nature’s best carbon storage units – they truly are the lungs of the planet. The climate science makes clear that we need to protect these forests and stop expanding fossil fuels. Allowing fossil fuel pollution to increase because a forest wasn’t logged might take pressure off politicians but it wont take pressure off our climate.
“If Australia only saves forests so that polluters can increase their fossil fuel use, the science says there is no benefit to our planet.
The Dissidents (w/ Cartoonist Derf Backderf) | TCHR
— —This interview is also available on podcast platforms and Rumble.
The images created by socialist and antiwar political cartoonists during the period around World War I were powerful tools for countering the elite’s propaganda of the time. The Russian Revolution had just occurred, and in response to extreme wealth inequality, a militant working class was on the rise in the United States. The ruling class was afraid and responded to the growing dissent with severe measures – a massive propaganda campaign, laws that limited free expression, deportations, violence and imprisonment. It was an era that echoes the repression – ICE raids, the designation of Leftists as “terrorists” and restrictions of academic freedom - that is occurring today.
Submission on the Government’s proposed capital gains tax and negative gearing reforms (Budget Bill Tranche 2)
— Organisation: Prosper Australia —This submission addresses two of the instruments under consultation. On the draft Income Tax Assessment (Method for Apportioning Capital Gains and Capital Losses) Determination 2026, we identify two defects in the prescribed method as it applies to real property — the treatment of capital expenditure incurred after 1 July 2027, and of discontinuous value events […]
The post Submission on the Government’s proposed capital gains tax and negative gearing reforms (Budget Bill Tranche 2) first appeared on Prosper Australia.The cost-of-living lesson for the government in early super access debate
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —On this episode of Dollars & Sense, Greg and Elinor discuss One Nation’s superannuation proposal, ways the government could provide genuine cost-of-living support, the Reserve Bank’s twisted thinking over inflation and interest rates, and Barnaby Joyce’s run-from-Jesus moment.
This discussion was recorded on Thursday 10 September 2026.
More Fool Me: How the gas industry tricked Australia by Richard Denniss, the latest Vantage Point essay from Australia Institute Press, is available now.
Use the code ‘FOOLME’ on a four-edition Vantage Point subscription to receive a free copy of Richard’s book, Econobabble.
Host: Greg Jericho, Chief Economist, the Australia Institute // @grogsgamut
Host: Elinor Johnston-Leek, Senior Content Producer, the Australia Institute // @elinorjohnstonleek
Show notes:
Digital duty of care laws don’t go far enough – poll
— Organisation: The Australia Institute —The poll of 1042 voters, conducted by YouGov, found that 93% of Australian voters want online platforms to be legally required to provide a safe online environment and prevent harmful content.
83% of Australians want those spreading dangerous content to be fined, while half (50%) say the executives of offending companies should also be jailed.
Seven in ten voters (72%) believe users who suffer physical or mental harm should be able to seek compensation from the platform, including 62% of One Nation supporters and 69% of Coalition voters.
Key points:
Necessary Beliefs
— —
For fun, I like to read Golden Age mysteries, and so recently picked up The Wrong Murder Mystery (Charles Barry) which was published in 1933.
Current ScholarshipCentral Banking and Sustainability
— Organisation: Just Money —Kern Alexander & Seraina Grünewald
Central Banking and Sustainability”
Gloria Steinem’s Rolling Feminist Revolution
— Organisation: The Claremont Institute —Gloria Steinem, a popularizer of feminist dogmas, died last week at the age of 92. She promoted many of the false doctrines of women’s liberation beginning in the 1960s through her persona, writings, publications, and speeches. As she passes from the scene, few of the original so-called second-wave feminists remain. Yet the overwhelming victories the movement has achieved in the decades since have largely obscured the radicalism at its center.
As I researched my second book, The Recovery of Family Life: Exposing the Limits of Modern Ideologies, I read Steinem’s influential 1970 Time essay, “What It Would Be Like If Women Win,” to understand what the fully realized feminist project would look like. What emerged from my survey of her work was the idea of an unfinished and unfinishable Rolling Feminist Revolution.


