Incoming Feed Items

States Must Do More to Secure Our Elections

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

Americans can’t afford to be complacent about our election security. The right to vote is one of the most indispensable civil rights in a constitutional republic, but it is not self-executing. Laws must protect that right, ensure its proper administration, and defend it against error, fraud, and foreign influence.

Citizenship must be verified when voters register. States must maintain accurate voter rolls and give federal authorities the data to which they’re legally entitled. They must also have reliable proof-of-eligibility requirements and prosecute election-law violations.

This is ultimately not merely an election-administration issue—it is a matter of sovereignty.

The proposition that only American citizens may vote in elections is a cornerstone of our republic. The citizenship requirement preserves self-government and ensures that those who decide our elections are members of the American political community. If these basic rules are treated as mere aspiration rather than an enforceable legal requirement, then American sovereignty is at risk.

The vote—and the machinery that receives, records, verifies, counts, and reports it—is how the American people confer legitimate authority on public officials.

Beasts, Gods, and Bots: Facing down the Specter of a Post-Human Future | The American Mind Podcast

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

The American Mind’s podcast is a weekly conversation with Ryan Williams, Spencer Klavan, and Mike Sabo devoted to uncovering the ideas and principles that drive American political life. Stream here or download from your favorite podcast host.

Beasts, Gods, and Bots: Facing down the Specter of a Post-Human Future | The American Mind Podcast

Younger Australians “locked out” as intergenerational housing divide grows

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

On this episode of Follow the Money, Senator Barbara Pocock, Australian Greens Spokesperson for Housing & Homelessness, joins Ebony Bennett to discuss the housing crisis, its long-term impacts on the lives of younger Australians, and her proposals to turn the situation around.

This episode was recorded on Tuesday 6 October.

If you or anyone you know needs help, you can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or online at www.lifeline.org.au.

Guest: Barbara Pocock, Senator for South Australia and Australian Greens Spokesperson for Housing & Homelessness // @barbarapocock

Host: Ebony Bennett, Deputy Director, the Australia Institute // @ebonybennett

Show notes:

Locked out: the growing generational housing divide, Select Committee on Intergenerational Housing Inequity (September 2026)

An Australian Land Tax: Past, Present, and Prospects

 — Organisation: Prosper Australia — 

135th Henry George Commemorative Dinner Address by Mr Adam Creighton, Graduate House, Thursday, 17th September 2026.  Matt, thank you very much for the introduction. Look, it’s a great pleasure to be here. I’m very grateful to the committee for reaching out to me, and Rayna in particular, when we had a nice tea, actually, on […]

The post An Australian Land Tax: Past, Present, and Prospects first appeared on Prosper Australia.

Australians are right to fear this tech. Here are the laws which can protect us

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

If a week is a long time in politics, then it’s an eternity in the universe of artificial intelligence.

All the way back in June, Andrew Charlton, the Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economy, gave a speech on the government’s commitment to AI.

Charlton is an unabashed advocate of Australia embracing AI and developing what he calls “world-class Australian AI industry”.

Charlton explained that this aspiration would not succeed without one non-negotiable ingredient: trust in the technology. The Australian people would need to trust that the government could protect them from the risks of AI and that they would share in the benefits of AI.

He finished his speech in observing that “… trust is not the price of an AI industry. Trust is the foundation of one.”

Charlton’s speech hasn’t aged well. On September 18, CNN reported that an intelligence report provided to the US military and generated with the help of a chatbot “almost started a war“, by falsely asserting that a Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting nuclear material to aid Iran.

According to the report, shortly before the US military prepared to intercept the vessel, the errors in the report were identified and the plan was abandoned.

The Great Farewell

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

Washington’s Farewell Address is often celebrated as one of the great documents of American history—the political testament of the nation’s founding father. Its authorship, however, has occasioned debate. Some, especially those who viewed Washington as a puppet of closet monarchists, wondered if he was even in charge of his own administration and whatever statements emerged from it.

The record shows that while Washington certainly had assistance during the drafting process, the document was truly his—he dictated what he wanted included and gave the final approval of the text. The tenets espoused reflected beliefs Washington had held for decades—beliefs he hoped could guide the nation from infancy to maturity. The Farewell Address was a worthy capstone to his extraordinary career and a touchstone of American republicanism.

Writing the Farewell Address

Notes from the 2026 Texas Tribune Festival

 — Author: Patricia Roberts-Miller — 
photo of speaker and interviewer at Tribfest

I thought I’d do a brief description of some of the panels I went to at the Texas Tribune Festival. The TribFest (as it’s called) is policy wonk heaven. It’s three days of panels and interviews on policy questions.

Bright Lights, Big Dystopia

 — Author: Sarah Kendzior — 

You are not the kind of person who writes about Jay McInerney. But here you are, and you cannot say the terrain is entirely unfamiliar, although the details are fuzzy.

McInerney is best known as the author of the 1984 coke-fueled bestseller “Bright Lights, Big City”. You devoured it in high school and can quote it from memory. You just did that in the paragraph above. You are tired of repeating yourself and want to see what it’s like to repeat others. Robots are stealing your work and now they’ll jack a McInerney line by proxy. They’ll snort his line and come back for more. You’re not a stealer, you’re a dealer. Does blatant theft still count as theft? Not in The US of AI!

You apologize to Jay McInerney for this and all that follows.

When you were sixteen, McInerney confirmed your suspicions about big city elites. They were high and hollow. McInerney treated them with a wry detachment you envied. You were a 1990s teen: prey for the Epstein Class. Detachment felt good. You wished more men would detach from you.

Shared challenges, shared failures: Canada and Australia aren’t meeting the moment

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

On this episode of After America, Québécoise senator and pollution control expert Dr Rosa Galvez joins Dr Emma Shortis to discuss the Carney government’s response to the Trump administration, climate policy failures in Australia and Canada, and the opportunities for a better future for both countries.

This episode was recorded on Thursday 17 September.

Guest: The Hon Senator Dr Rosa Galvez, Independent Senator for Québec (Bedford), Canada // @senrosagalvez

Host: Emma Shortis, Director, International & Security Affairs, the Australia Institute // @emmashortis

Show notes:

Australia and Canada can learn from each other on climate if we separate action from declaration by Rosa Galvez, Guardian Australia (September 2026)

Climate Integrity Summit 2026, the Australia Institute on YouTube

Full-page apology for record coal expansion at Fiji climate talks

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

As leaders gather in Fiji for crucial pre-COP31 climate talks, co-hosted by Australia’s Climate Change & Energy Minister Chris Bowen, delegates will see this message in the Fiji Times (photo).

Climate change is threatening the very existence of several Pacific Island nations. Pacific leaders have repeatedly asked Australia to reduce its reliance on, and export of, fossil fuels.

Yet, despite the rhetoric of Minister Bowen and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at events like the Pacific Islands Forum, Australia continues to expand fossil fuel mining.

Just last week the Hunter Valley Operations coal mine extension, which will generate 809 million tonnes of climate pollution out to 2045, was given planning approval in NSW.

“Australia is a terrible neighbour to its Pacific family,” said Noah Schultz-Byard, Strategic Director at The Australia Institute.

“Australian leaders fly around the world making all sorts of bold statements about meaningful climate action, then they return home and approve new coal and gas projects.

“For nations like Kiribati, Fiji, Vanuatu, Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands, the climate crisis is real and it’s happening now. It is not some distant dystopian prediction.

“This round of COP negotiations has become a crucial test for Australia. If we are to have any respectability in the international climate space, then strong, real-world commitments to phasing out fossil fuels are an essential minimum outcome from this year’s conference.”

Regrets, I’ve Had a Few

 — Author: Zoe "Doc Impossible" Wendler — 

This article is a joint project with the Gender Dysphoria Bible, and is licensed under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Rejecting Effective Altruism’s New Atheism

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

On May 25, 2026, Pope Leo XIV stood in the Vatican’s Synod Hall and presented Magnifica Humanitas, his encyclical on artificial intelligence. Beside two cardinals sat the lay speaker chosen to address the room, Chris Olah, a co-founder of Anthropic and self-described atheist working to develop the “soul” of its AI model, Claude.

The Catholic Church, the West’s oldest institution, has long stood at the forefront of the day’s most important moral questions. It has often found itself opposed to insidious ideologies that swept the globe. In the 1930s and ’40s, the Vatican waged a secret war against Nazism. Then it took on Communism. But at the start of the 21st century, a new ideology emerged that would eventually take hold among wealthy tech elites called Effective Altruism, or EA.

Developed from the stark utilitarian philosophy of Princeton University’s Peter Singer, EA claims to use evidence and reason to determine how to benefit others as efficiently as possible. Effective Altruists like Bill Gates and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei direct enormous sums of money toward causes they believe will produce the greatest measurable benefit, regardless of whether those causes are personally meaningful to them.

The Cruel Stupidity of Lethal Injection

 — Author: Betsy Phillips — 
Opinion: I thought I hated the death penalty in all the ways there are to hate it. But now I also hate it because Tennessee is embarrassingly bad at it.

Political Instrument of the People

 — Publication: Perspectives Journal — 

Only months into Avi Lewis’ leadership of the New Democratic Party of Canada, the work to rebuild the party appears underway. Beyond “winning seats” in a long forthcoming federal general election, “rebuilding” the NDP from the disastrous 2025 election results involves three main tasks: restoring energy among current members, growing the membership, and regaining public support. These three tasks will depend on making the party more internally democratic. This is clearly recognized by Lewis who has the stated ambition of making the NDP “a political instrument of the people” which entitled his leadership policy platform for renewing party democracy. However, this goal cannot be achieved by reproducing the 20th century model of intra-party democracy that still structures the party. Instead, building a truly democratic party requires a new model for the 21st century, capable of raising the bar for Canadian democracy. There are certainly proven alternative models that have worked and have been previously demonstrated within the NDP.

Summary of government assistance available for migrants and refugees

 — Organisation: Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) — 

This table summarises eligibility for social security, other government financial assistance, and Medicare for people who come to Australia as migrants or refugees.

New report tracks economic outcomes for migrants in Australia

 — Organisation: Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) — 

New report tracks economic outcomes for migrants in Australia

New research by the ACOSS and UNSW-led Poverty and Inequality Partnership finds that migrants in Australia have comparatively strong employment outcomes and low rates of poverty, but that outcomes vary considerably for people depending on their pathway as a migrant, refugee or person seeking asylum.

The report, The first 10 years: Employment, income and poverty among migrants and refugees in Australia, highlights concerningly high rates of poverty among people holding humanitarian, family and student visas, and points to the need for greater employment and financial support to support the wellbeing of new migrants.

Unsurprisingly, skilled migrants have the highest employment rates and lowest rates of poverty among the different visa categories.

People who are family migrants are more likely to be disadvantaged in the labour market. Women on family visas face particular barriers to employment participation with a third of women aged between 25 and 44 not in the labour force (33.2%), compared with the average of 20.8%. 

Comparison of income support payments with wages ($2026)

 — Organisation: Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) — 

This graph compares the rates of JobSeeker, Youth Allowance and the Pension with average, median and minimum wages since 1990. It shows how JobSeeker (previously Newstart) was at a similar rate to the pension until the different indexation methods meant the payments started to diverge after 2000.

Note: Figures have been adjusted for inflation.

Sources: ACOSS calculation from Australian Bureau of Statistics (various years), Average weekly earnings, Australia; Services Australia (various years), A guide to Australian government payments; Fair Work Commission (various years), Minimum wage, Australia.

Most think income support is too low to live on

 — Organisation: Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) — 

Concerns about poverty in Australia are rising as cost-of-living pressures hit hard, with a majority of people agreeing income support payments are not enough to live on, according to new research by the ACOSS and UNSW Sydney-led Poverty and Inequality Partnership.

The vast majority of people surveyed support an increase to JobSeeker, with almost nine in ten (87%) people agreeing that unemployment payments should be enough so people don’t have to skip meals. 

It comes after the Federal Government’s Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee announced its first recommendation is to increase working-age income support payments in the forthcoming Federal Budget. 

The new research, which surveyed 2,520 people, found:

Households paying 30% or more of income for housing

 — Organisation: Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) — 

This figure shows that households with the lowest income who rented their homes have spent a growing share on their income on rent in recent years, leaving them with less money for other essentials. Among people rent their homes who were in the lowest 20% income group, the proportion who spent 30% or more of their income on rent (ie, in rental stress) rose from 52% in 2020-21 to 57% in 2022-23.

What’s the point of neoliberalism?

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

On this episode of What’s the Point?, Richard Denniss explains the theory of ‘trickle-down’ economics – and why so much of the money seems to be trickling the other way.

This episode was recorded on Thursday 24 September.

More Fool Me: How the gas industry tricked Australia by Richard Denniss, the latest Vantage Point essay from Australia Institute Press, is available now.

Use the code ‘FOOLME’ on a four-edition Vantage Point subscription to receive a free copy of Richard’s book, Econobabble.

Read more on The Point.

Host: Richard Denniss, co-Chief Executive Officer, the Australia Institute // @richarddenniss

Host: Anna Chang, Managing Editor, The Point // @annachang

Show notes:

Hon Dr Jim Chalmers MP | Bernie Fraser Oration 2026, the Australia Institute

Thoughts on the Mass Rape at Cornell University

 — Author: Chris Hedges — 

What Do Authoritarians Do When They Are About to Lose an Election?

 — Author: Thomas Zimmer — 

Land tax retreat is a betrayal of working Victorians

 — Organisation: Prosper Australia — 

Prosper Australia has condemned the Victorian Government’s decision to unwind its land tax reforms, warning that the move puts short-term political relief ahead of the long-term interests of working Victorians. Premier Ben Carroll has announced that Victoria’s land tax-free threshold will progressively return to $300,000, ultimately removing around 250,000 people from the land tax system. […]

The post Land tax retreat is a betrayal of working Victorians first appeared on Prosper Australia.

Why the Populist Right Is Gaining Ground

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

The first round of Brazil’s presidential election is on Sunday. Two candidates are locked in a dead heat: Lula da Silva, incumbent president and founder of the center-left Workers’ Party, and Flávio Bolsonaro, the 45-year-old son of ex-president Jair Bolsonaro (2018-2022). Last year, Jair Bolsonaro was convicted of plotting a coup to remain in power after losing the 2022 election and sentenced to more than 27 years in prison.

The parallels between Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro are notable. They were elected in 2016 and 2018, respectively. Both are populist nationalists. Both are coarse, politically incorrect, and hostile to critics. Most remarkably, both lost re-election, after which supporters stormed the halls of Congress seeking to overturn the result. Though Trump, in contrast to Bolsonaro, avoided prison and returned to office, both command die-hard support and lead political movements that dominate the Right in their countries.

It is reasonable to ask why two countries as different as the U.S. and Brazil have followed such similar political tracks since the late 2010s. Why did the Trump model work in Brazil? Trump’s signature issues—illegal immigration and tariffs—were irrelevant there. To answer this question, we need to step back and consider populism in broad terms.

Tune In, Drop Out, Start Up

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

Because I’m going to be quite critical of Theo Baker’s How to Rule the World, it feels only right to start with three pieces of sincere praise: the book held my attention all the way to the end, I learned things from it, and I read it twice. These are not reactions I expect most new books to generate, let alone one written by someone not yet of legal drinking age. Hence on this basis alone, I would have to concede that Rule (borrowing Baker’s shorthand for a “secret” Stanford class, about which more below) is a real achievement.

September 2026 Newsletter

 — Organisation: Open Access Australasia — 

The Greens’ new leader | Between the Lines

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

From our CEOs – with Richard Denniss

The Greens’ recent switch from Larissa Waters to David Shoebridge was both rapid and polite. But while the change might have come as a surprise, what is more predictable is the hand wringing from much of the commentariat and the PM about whether the Greens should be ‘populist’ or ‘pragmatic’, and whether they should act like a ‘party of government’ or a ‘party of protest’.

Have you ever heard that question asked of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation?

Senator Shoebridge has taken on one of the most powerful roles in Australia at the midpoint in the Albanese Government’s second term. To be clear, whenever the Prime Minister can’t get Angus Taylor to support his proposed laws his next call is, quite literally, to the Greens.

While the PM may take comfort in the fact that Angus Taylor is so receptive to much of Labor’s legislative agenda, for example his recent cuts to the NDIS and his weak efforts on gambling reform, much to his frustration sometimes his Cabinet and party room push him to do things that even Angus won’t support. And that’s when he needs the Greens’ 10 votes in the Senate to combine with Labor’s 30 to get the minimum 39 votes he needs to pass a bill through the Senate.

Obviously, Anthony Albanese would like the Greens to hand those 10 votes over for free, and obviously both the Greens elected representatives and their voters want them to extract a progressive price. And that’s where Senator Shoebridge’s job becomes so interesting.

Thérèse Casgrain: An Unlikely Social Democrat

 — Publication: Perspectives Journal — 

Listen to the full conversation on the Perspectives Journal podcast, available to subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, Amazon Music, and all other major podcast platforms.

George Washington’s Wisdom for the Midterms

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

The 2026 midterm elections present a tough environment for the Republican Party, raising questions about how to campaign in such challenging circumstances. As is often the case in American politics, the economy is a central concern for voters. In the last few weeks, prices—particularly for gas—have been too high for the comfort of any incumbent party. What have Republicans been saying to assuage voters’ concerns?

Some have taken a kind of high road, encouraging or even admonishing voters to rise above self-interest and consider the loftier aims President Trump and his administration are pursuing. Yes, gas prices may be high, but the president is trying to end the Iranian threat to American national security. This process is taking longer and causing more economic pain than anyone would like. But it is worth it for the nation in the long run, and so patriotic voters should toughen up. So the argument runs.

This approach, however, has no shortage of critics. They think it is futile or worse (maybe insulting) to tell ordinary voters, whose economic means are increasingly limited, to grin and bear higher prices on the necessities of life. This environment, they suggest, is a recipe for electoral disaster for the Republican Party.

Adam Creighton: Land tax should replace stamp duty and substantially reduce income taxes

 — Organisation: Prosper Australia — 

Renowned economist and journalist Adam Creighton will describe land tax as “the most unsuccessful great idea in economic history”, remaining a tiny share of government revenues despite having strong intellectual support from economists across the political spectrum, from Friedman to Stiglitz over centuries. “Australia has a fascinating and promising history of land tax reform, from […]

The post Adam Creighton: Land tax should replace stamp duty and substantially reduce income taxes first appeared on Prosper Australia.

Release of Financial Stability Review – October 2026

 — Organisation: Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) — 
Media release number 2026-28: The RBA today published its October 2026 Financial Stability Review.

New world, same Reserve Bank

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

On this episode of Dollars & Sense, Greg tells Skye that households will struggle “for not much good” because of the Reserve Bank’s latest interest rate hike.

This discussion was recorded on Wednesday 30 September 2026.

Join an outstanding line-up of policymakers, academics and independent experts at the Australia Institute’s Revenue Summit 2026. Tickets are on sale now for the event at Parliament House in Canberra on Wednesday 14 October.

Host: Greg Jericho, Chief Economist, the Australia Institute // @grogsgamut

Host: Skye Predavec, Researcher, the Australia Institute // @skyelark

Show notes:

If turbocharged petrol prices are driving up inflation, then why are Australia’s unemployed on the line? by Greg Jericho, Guardian Australia (October 2026)

Call It Evil: Understanding the Trump Era (w/ Susan Neiman) | TCHR

 — Author: Chris Hedges — 

This interview is also available on podcast platforms and Rumble.

There are many books exploring how and why voters in the United States elected President Donald Trump, but author Susan Neiman argues that “Nobody has really focused on the moral background to this administration and to our acceptance of it.” It was that void she sought to fill in her newest book, “Call It Evil: Understanding the Trump Era.”

Neiman joins Hedges in this episode of The Chris Hedges Report to discuss her new book and examine the crises of today: the rise of fascism, the ravages of neoliberalism, and how institutions and individuals have surrendered to them.

Big Gas still taking the piss: New data shows zero tax paid by major exporters

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

The new ATO data has prompted renewed calls for the introduction of a flat 25% gas export tax, which Australia Institute research estimates would raise $17 billion a year.

Just last week, The Australia Institute released a sequel to its popular Big Gas Is Taking The Piss ad campaign. Today, the ATO underlined the failure of the existing tax arrangements on gas exports.

Today’s ATO data reveals:

  • Santos Limited has racked up an 11th straight year of paying zero corporate tax payments from a total of nearly $52 billion in sales.
  • Darwin’s Ichthys LNG Pty Ltd paid zero corporate tax or PRRT for the 7th year running, from a total of $53 billion in sales.
  • Petroleum Resource Rent Tax (PRRT) revenue was a mere $1.8 billion, down from a peak of $2.0 billion in 2021-22.

“Every Australian should be furious that they are getting nothing in return for the sale of their resources,” said Greg Jericho, Chief Economist at The Australia Institute.

“How on earth can a company like Santos sell nearly $52 billion worth of Australian gas yet, for an 11th year in a row, pay not a single cent in corporate tax?

One Must Imagine Sisyphus Happy

 — Author: Julia Doubleday — 

“Is it politically incorrect to say 90% of the time Long Covid is pure hysteria”

So reads a tweet with 13 thousand likes on my timeline.

I sigh and consider before I decide to respond.

Should I bother?

It’s been a long, long week. This round of tiring opinions about the disease that left me homebound over two years ago was kicked off by the infamous “masked lesbian bar” discourse, which has served its purpose of kicking up a rancid round of ableism, queerphobia and “anti-woke” panic.

I do ultimately reply. I link to a recent article in Smithsonian Magazine about where the science is on Long COVID today, a good and thorough piece which interviewed prominent researchers. I ask the original poster to stop making the lives of sick people more difficult.

I mute my response and move on with my day.

While the original tweet received 13 thousand likes, I can see now that my response received 331.

This isn’t the only tweet I replied to during the long week.

There was the tweet about Long Covid “not really being a specific condition.”

The Crisis of America is the Crisis of the West | The American Mind Podcast ft. Steve Hayward

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

The American Mind’s podcast is a weekly conversation with Ryan Williams, Spencer Klavan, and Mike Sabo devoted to uncovering the ideas and principles that drive American political life. Stream here or download from your favorite podcast host.

The Crisis of America is the Crisis of the West | The American Mind Podcast ft. Steve Hayward

A Public Flat Earth

 — Author: Sarah Kendzior — 

This is an excerpt from my book They Knew, published in 2022. I’m posting it due to the tremendous response to my article Gutting the Fourth Estate, published last week. They Knew provides more context — and maps out the disastrous changes in tech and media for which we now pay the price.

I will not paywall an article about why paywalls are bad. I don’t paywall any articles. My work is supported by volunteer paying subscribers. You can support me here:

Sarah Kendzior’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Congress and the Collapse of Constitutional Republicanism in America

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

There’s nothing Congress likes better than not legislating. The legislative process in theory still takes place in Congress, but the results, which have the name and form of law, are in reality not law, properly understood. Legislative policy is still made in America, but it overwhelmingly takes forms other than laws enacted by Congress according to the process set forth in Article I of the Constitution. By conferring legislative power on others and leaving vital public issues unaddressed through congressional action, members of the legislature are effectively failing to carry out their constitutionally designated duties.

The importance of this change in the American political system cannot be overstated. Delegation—Congress’s abdication of its core legislative function—is key to understanding both the modern Congress and the crisis of constitutional government in America. Congress’s regular use of delegation has led to two seismic consequences: institutional failure on a massive scale and, more fundamentally, a transformation in the very character of the American regime.

Congress and the Legislative Power

How the NT won Australia’s race-to-the-bottom on online gambling regulation

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

On this episode of Follow the Money, Justine Davis, Independent Member for Johnston in the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly, joins Ebony Bennett to discuss Australians’ extraordinary gambling losses, the federal government’s failure to create a national regulator for online gambling, and her proposal to lift standards in the NT.

This episode was recorded on Friday 25 September.

If this episode raised issues for you, you can call the National Gambling Helpline on 1800 858 858 for free, professional and confidential support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Or visit Gambling Help Online at www.gamblinghelponline.org.au.

If you or anyone you know needs help, you can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or online at www.lifeline.org.au.

Guest: Justine Davis, Member for Johnston, Northern Territory Legislative Assembly // @justinedavismla

Host: Ebony Bennett, Deputy Director, the Australia Institute // @ebonybennett

NSW approves huge coal mine, says offsets provide “real environmental benefit”

 — Organisation: The Australia Institute — 

The mine, approved by the NSW Independent Planning Commission (IPC), now has approval to operate to 2045, generating 809 million tonnes of climate pollution, equivalent to almost two years of Australia’s national emissions.

“This is not a ‘just transition’. It’s not even a transition. It’s an expansion,” said Rod Campbell, Research Director at The Australia Institute.

“The government pretends it’s ok to dig up more coal in the Hunter Valley because someone, somewhere else promised to do something to reduced emissions.

“This approval shows that Australia’s climate policies are working exactly as the government intended: pretend to be tackling emissions reduction while carrying on expanding coal.

“Australia’s climate policies are designed to safeguard fossil fuel projects like this one, and carbon offsets are central to this.

“The decision states on page 1 that the climate impacts of the huge coal mine ‘are managed effectively within the parameters of the NSW and Commonwealth statutory and policy regimes’.

“Scientists say there should be no new coal mines, but NSW decision makers say this huge mine is fine because of ‘requirements for minimisation and offsets’.

“The approval text says that carbon offsets have “real environmental benefits” not once, not twice, but three times.

“This is partly a result of key figures in NSW environment groups spending months, if not years, promoting and developing dodgy carbon offset proposals.

Rent cap call as intergenerational housing inquiry report drops 

 — Organisation: Everybody's Home — 

A Senate inquiry report out today must be a turning point for renters, Everybody’s Home said, as the campaign urges the federal government to turbocharge social housing and limit rent increases.

The Select Committee on Intergenerational Housing Inequity has made 10 findings including that the housing crisis is affecting every generation and fuelling inequality. 

Across party lines, the committee agreed that many elements of the housing crisis arise from the decline in investment in public housing, and it must be addressed by more investment in these rentals. 

The committee also found that rent increases have outpaced wages growth by several multiples, and that too many Australians live in real anxiety about maintaining a safe roof over their heads and affording rent. 

Everybody’s Home spokesperson Maiy Azize said rents have been rising for years and there’s no end in sight. 

“Renters have been forced to pay higher and higher rents for years. The odds of being pushed into housing stress or turning to homelessness services for help have never been higher,” Ms Azize said.

“Renters can never catch a break. No matter whether interest rates rise or fall, renters still cop rent hikes year on year. 

Our Political Economy and Theirs

 — Publication: Progress in Political Economy — 

Political economy approaches are an increasingly popular framework in the Public Health and Biomedical Sciences scholarships. A quick search of major biomedical and public health databases, PubMed and Ovid, highlights over 2,000 and 1,200 papers, respectively, using ‘political economy’ in their title or abstract. Most of these papers that utilise political economy in some way, shape or form have been published since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, which suggests that the crisis helped elucidate the centrality of political economy factors to matters of health and illness. This is, of course, a welcome development; the more that our colleagues in Biomedical and Public Health fields can integrate political economy analysis into their studies, the better it will be for us all.

Enough Division: An Alberta Referendum Explainer

 — Publication: Perspectives Journal — 

Progressive Albertans are on the front lines organizing for the referendum fight that Premier Danielle Smith, and her United Conservative Party government, have imposed upon the people of Alberta on October 19. It is not just Alberta separatism that is on the table: there are 10 questions being put to Albertans this fall that target immigrants and the province’s legal authority over the federal government.

There are mechanisms in Alberta for citizen engagement that would, through petitioning, force the government to call referenda on questions designed by the public, but this decision did not happen through these public mechanisms. A previous attempt to petition for an independence referendum was deemed unconstitutional by a federal judge earlier this spring as no consultation took place with First Nations whose sovereignty would be affected by this process. Instead of committing to democratic processes, Smith’s government, through an ‘Orders in Council’ executive decision, has authorized these referenda to take place. No mass of real public urgency forced these issues to referendum votes.

Senator John Kennedy's Joke Book

 — Organisation: Climate Town — 

The End of Old Guard Conservatism

 — Organisation: The Claremont Institute — 

Over the past few weeks, Old Guard conservatives have been making a concerted effort to attack Vice President JD Vance and the New Right.

Many were critical of Vance’s support for a Trump Administration proposal to allow federal dollars to go to stay-at-home parents. Dana Loesch suggested that those who accepted such funds weren’t “man enough.” Another conservative called it a “scheme” and “a longstanding tenet of the Postliberal/Orbanist policy agenda.”

Old Guard critic Jay Caruso mocked Vance for saying the administration would not “let” companies exchange American workers “with cheap foreign labor,” accusing the vice president of turning his back on the free market. Simultaneously, a chorus of Old Guard conservatives have been blasting Vance for supposedly refusing to distance himself from Nazis and groypers—and from a group of trinitarian Christians, the Society for American Civic Renewal.

Advancing a National Conversation about Australia’s future, with Taylor Hawkins

 — Organisation: Per Capita — 

At our September 2026 John Cain Lunch we heard from Managing Director of Foundations for Tomorrow, Taylor Hawkins, about building the vision and infrastructure for long-term governance in Australia for a thriving community, environment and economy. Watch the recording below. 


Australia’s future is bigger than the next election. Australia’s capacity to govern for the long-term and safeguard the wellbeing of current and future generations depends on more than individual policies or political champions. It requires leaders equipped to think and act beyond immediate pressures, institutions capable of planning for the future and a public mandate that supports long-term decision-making.

Foundations For Tomorrow (FFT) is a non-profit organisation working to equip Australian leaders to think beyond electoral cycles and financial quarters to make the strategic long-term investments that lay the foundations for a thriving community, environment, and economy for years to come.

FFT is spearheading the National Conversation Development Lab, a collaborative project bringing together 240+ organisations and experts to develop a National Conversation about Australia’s future.