This was slightly down on 2024 but, nevertheless, the CEO and executive group paid themselves $35.3 million, an increase of $2.4 million. CEO Andrew Irvine got a cool $5.6 million as remuneration in the year to September 2025.
NAB is Australia’s fifth largest company and third largest bank by market value. It accounts for 17% of all the loans to Australian residents. That includes 14% of housing loans and 22% of business loans, which means it is slightly biased towards its business customers.
Nevertheless, NAB is one of the big banks which, between them, control 72% of all Australian home loans. On average, they make $213,480 in pure profit from the average first home buyer paying off a 30 year mortgage.
“The NAB’s slightly lower profit has been described as “lukewarm” and “disappointing”. It is neither of those things. It is obscene,” said Richard Denniss, co-CEO of The Australia Institute.
“The lack of competition among the big banks in Australia comes at a huge cost to struggling homeowners.
“Just like the similar profit posted by Westpac a few days ago, this massive profit from home loans far exceeds the level of risk the bank undertakes.
“The federal government has a huge majority and therefore a huge opportunity to help take the burden off the people who need help the most.
The meddling and infiltration of governments in Latin America by the United States is a huge chapter of its 20th century history. One of the most egregious and blatant examples of intervention was in Chile, where the democratically elected socialist president Salvador Allende was overthrown by the CIA-backed military coup in 1973.
The ensuing years saw violent repression of student activists, labor leaders, journalists, leftwing politicians and dissidents at the helm of a brutal military dictatorship led by Augusto Pinochet. Among the victims of this ruthless crackdown were two American citizens, Charles Horman and Frank Teruggi.
Greg and Elinor discuss the Reserve Bank’s predictable rates decision, Microsoft’s decision to refund some customers after pressure from the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, and whether Australia’s tobacco excise has become self-defeating.
“But if they do this on net zero, they’ll never get elected” is one of the most common comments in response to having the situation explained to them.
This is the correct response, because the Liberals can’t get elected if they do this.
As much as some may look to Tim Wilson’s defeat of Zoe Daniels in Goldstein as proof they can manage to win back the teals (as James Paterson did on Wednesday), they forget that is when the Liberals had a net zero policy at least partly based in the science – and Goldstein was a perfect storm of circumstances unlikely to ever be repeated.
(Also, the best way to remind people of why they voted in independent in the first place is to have someone like Wilson back on the political scene.)
The thing to understand with all of this is that it is not logical and it never has been. This is about individual power and survival.
The Nationals have been openly dragging the Liberals around since the Turnbull years. Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton were canny enough to manage to contain the damage (and were also mostly on board). Ley has no such authority.
Counterintuitively, the best way to come to grips with the here and now is not to immerse oneself in the constant froth and daily firestorms of up-to-the-minute journalism and media. Real understanding requires a perspective informed by serious engagement with political history, a study of human nature, and a careful engagement with the noble if imperfect intellectual heritage left to us by our Western and American forebears. So the latest sensation from the world of podcasting—Tucker Carlson’s two-and-a-half-hour interview with the young streamer Nick Fuentes—will not be best addressed by those caught up in the breathless excitement of the moment, nor by those fixated on the cults of personality surrounding these two broadcasters. The issues raised by Fuentes and Carlson need sober evaluation from a critical distance.
Recently, yet another scholar used me as an example of someone who says that demagoguery is always bad, while acknowledging that I explicitly say it isn’t. Today, a friend asked me whether Mamdani’s speech was demagoguery, since there does seem to be an us v. them. So, she asked, is demagoguery sometimes necessary for in response to demagoguery?
On this episode of Follow the Money, Richard Denniss and Ebony Bennett discuss the lack of accountability in Australia’s universities, why some institutions’ claims of financial crises aren’t supported by their auditors, and what Australians think about the state of the sector.
This guest blog was written by our Trustee Dianne Danquah as part of Trustees Week, which celebrates the contributions of volunteers like Dianne. Even before joining in June, Dianne made huge contributions through being a youth advocate. I became a trustee at the Equality Trust earlier this year because I believe everyone deserves to live […]
Matteo Crosignani, Thomas Eisenbach, and Fulvia Fringuellotti
As in previous years, we provide in this post an update on the vulnerability of the U.S. banking system based on four analytical models that capture different aspects of this vulnerability. We use data through 2025:Q2 for our analysis, and also discuss how the vulnerability measures have changed since our last update one year ago.
Polling also found only 3% of Australians think making a profit should be a primary purpose of universities – however more than half believe that it currently is a primary purpose.
Meanwhile, fewer than half of Australians believe educating students is currently a primary purpose of universities, despite 80% thinking it should be.
Key findings:
Three out of four Australians (77%) think university degrees should cost $10,000 or less per year.
About three in five Australians (58%) think university degrees should cost $5,000 or less per year.
Less than one in 20 (3%) of Australians think that making a profit should be a primary purpose of universities, yet more than half (54%) believe that it currently is a primary purpose.
Four in five (80%) Australians think that educating students should be a primary purpose of universities, yet 44% believe it is currently a primary purpose of universities.
“University fees are totally out of step with community expectations. Despite about three in five Australians believing degrees should cost $5,000 or less a year, most university degrees are more expensive than this. Highly popular degrees such as arts, commerce, and law now cost about $17,000 per year,” said Jack Thrower, Senior Economist at The Australia Institute.
“High university fees are leading to mounting student debts, which are taking ever longer to pay off.
In Cultivating Socialism: Venezuela, ALBA, and the Politics of FoodSovereignty, Rowan Lubbock offers a compelling multiscalar analysis of the pursuit of food sovereignty. His account of the Boliviarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) and the central role of the Venezuelan state invites us to revisit the promise of regional integration as part of a socialist project of continental proportions. Cultivating Socialism highlights ALBA’s revolutionary challenge to US hegemony in Latin America and to the region’s historical dependency on commodity exports and outward-oriented growth. To do so, Lubbock – and the Venezuelan state – look to their neighbours and citizens to think about other sites and scales of transformation. There, he provides a Marxian and Poulantzasian reading not only of sovereignty but also of the subject of food sovereignty, seeing its achievement as ‘a democratic road to socialism’.
“I, Wisdom, dwell with prudence (phronēsis), and I find knowledge and discretion. By me kings reign, and rulers decree what is just.”– Proverbs 8:12–14 (ESV)
“Practical wisdom (phronēsis) is a true and reasoned state of capacity to act with regard to the things that are good or bad for man.” – Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics VI.5–13
As Thucydides observed, the causes that drive nations to war—fear, honor, and interest—remain constant. A prudent foreign policy recognizes the powerful pull of these passions without surrendering to them.
Leo Strauss is often accused of inspiring not only neoconservatism, a movement bereft of such wisdom, but specifically the vigorous interventionism championed by the most vociferous voices within its ranks. On the surface, the Platonic rationalism that searches for the discoverable “just city” seems to infer the duty to impose such a schema onto others, willing or not. In direct contrast, the “Realism and Restraint” school is often linked with ideologies of amorality or isolationism. “Just leave me alone and let me grill.”
Both of these caricatures are foolish simplifications. In reality, both approaches share a moral foundation rooted in prudence (phronēsis), the classical virtue of doing the right thing in the right way for the right reasons.
Prime Minister Mark Carney is about to break a campaign promise made just a few months ago that will hurt Canadians in the middle of Donald Trump’s trade war. During the federal election, the Liberal Party platform in April clearly stated its commitment to “capping, not cutting, public service employment.” Fast forward to Carney’s first budget, and the federal government is ready to slash public service jobs at a rate not seen in decades when we should be reinforcing its ranks to tackle this economic crisis.
For Canada’s public servants, this is not new. Public servants are used to being scapegoated as the source of government overspending or used as a bargaining chip to appease fiscal hawks. Justin Trudeau’s Liberals resorted to arbitrary cuts to the public service to win back public support as it waxed and waned, but then outsourced services to overpriced contractors that often could not deliver.
What’s On around Naarm/Melbourne & Regional Victoria: Nov 3-9, 2025 With thanks to the dedicated activists at Friends of the Earth Melbourne! . . . See also these Palestine events listings from around the country: 9954
It also shows the RBA cares more about inflation than jobs.
“Unsurprisingly the Reserve Bank has chosen to keep rates steady at 3.6% This reflects that yet again the RBA care more about inflation than maintaining full employment,” said Greg Jericho, Chief Economist at The Australia Institute.
“In the past month unemployment continued its steady rise to 4.5%, while the inflation had a surprisingly sharp increase due mostly to the end of state-based energy rebates.
“In response the RBA has shown it is less worried about ongoing rising unemployment than reacting to a surprising blip in inflation.
“The most recent household spending figures released yesterday showed households are slowing their spending and shifting towards spending on necessities.
“In order to keep unemployment from rising further that RBA must care as much about the full employment part of its dual mandate as it does inflation.”
The Statement on Monetary Policy sets out the Bank's assessment of current economic
conditions, both domestic and international, along with the outlook for Australian inflation and output growth.
A number of boxes on topics of special interest are also published. The Statement is issued four times a year.
The polling follows reporting of the Albanese Government’s Federal Labor Business Forum, where corporations pay up to $110,000 for privileged access to Government Ministers. Government ministers are also keeping details of the meetings secret by blocking access to ministerial diaries. The Liberal and National parties engage in similar activities, though their own business forums.
Key findings:
Three in five Australians (63%) think that cash-for-access payments constitute corrupt conduct. Only 12% do not.
Most Australians think cash-for-access constitutes corrupt conduct, regardless of voting intention.
Four in five Australians (82%) agree that paying for exclusive access to politicians gives corporations and special interests unfair political influence.
An overwhelming majority of Australians (78%) agree that politicians should refuse to participate in events where participants with a vested interest in government policies have paid for exclusive access.
“Politicians could improve public faith in democracy by ruling out taking money in a way that most Australians view as corrupt,” said Mark Ogge, Principal Advisor at The Australia Institute.
“It’s clear that cash-for-access payments completely fail the pub test.
Since the late 2010s, there has been a major revival of interest in the luminous work of cultural theorist Stuart Hall. This is manifest, for example, in the book series Stuart Hall: Selected Writings, published by Duke University Press, and in the work of units such as the Stuart Hall Foundation and the Stuart Hall Archive Project.
On this episode of After America, Dr Emma Shortis joins Angus Blackman to discuss some new Australia Institute polling, which shows that Australians are less than convinced that we “share values” with Trump’s America. Emma is then joined by Dr Frank Yuan and Allan Behm to discuss Trump’s meeting with Xi and the chaos whirling around the president.
The first part of this discussion was recorded on Friday 31st October. The second part was recorded on Monday 3rd November.
Dead Centre: How political pragmatism is killing us by Richard Denniss is available now via Australia Institute Press.
Guest: Allan Behm, Special Advisor in International Affairs, the Australia Institute
Guest: Dr Frank Yuan, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, The Australia Institute // @yuan-frank
Host: Emma Shortis, Director, International & Security Affairs, the Australia Institute // @emmashortis
Host: Angus Blackman, Executive Producer, the Australia Institute // @AngusRB
Great power competition now hinges on technological dominance. While the U.S. may master the machines of progress, we are faltering in securing the power that makes them run, a deficiency that our greatest competitor is beginning to weaponize against us.
Lithium exemplifies this dynamic. Beyond its well-known use in electric vehicles, lithium’s strategic value lies in securing the energy-intensive infrastructure that powers broader technological competition. Data centers—the backbone of artificial intelligence and cloud computing—increasingly rely on lithium-ion batteries, which China subjected to export controls last month. This is not an abstraction: lithium is more than a commodity—it has become a foundational national security asset.
This guest blog was written by our Trustees Yamini Cinamon Nair and Tom Allanson (Co-Chairs of the Board), and Kate Pickett and Richard Wilkinson (Co-founders and Patrons) as part of Trustees Week. This week is intended to celebrate the huge contributions our trustees make to the Equality Trust – so we started by asking them […]
Westpac has today announced a full-year profit of $10 billion before tax for the financial year ending on 30 September, 2025.
Westpac is one of Australia’s “big four” banks, which together control 72% of all loans to Australian residents.
By market capitalisation, Westpac ranks as Australia’s fifth largest listed company and third largest bank. Westpac alone holds 19% of all loans and 21% of all housing loans in the country.
Australia Institute research shows the big four banks make $213,480 profit over the 30-year life of an average size mortgage for a first-home buyer.
“Australia Institute figures don’t even include the extra profit banks make on any other savings or credit card accounts, transaction fees, kickbacks on insurance they sell your or the ridiculous prices they charge to get a bank cheque,” said Richard Denniss, co-CEO of The Australia Institute.
“The lack of competition among the big banks has come at the cost of home owners, and their massive profits from home loans far exceeds the level of risk the banks undertake.
“The Albanese Government has huge majority in Parliament, and huge opportunity to help take the burden off the people who need help the most.
“A small super profits tax, raising just over $1.7 billion in 2024-25, was imposed by the Coalition Government back in 2017 – that has clearly done little to dent the profits, or the market share of the big bank.
Virtual Convo! On Monday, November 3 at 7PM ET, Lee Vinsel, Cory Doctorow, and I will be jamming in a livestream about Cory's new book Enshittification. I love this book and I love that I'll get to brain jam with two people I adore. So please join us on the livestream here!
Cornell Talks. I have two talks at Cornell coming up if you happen to be in Ithaca:
When ‘sustainable’ fashion backfires on the environment Erez Yerushalmi and Krishnendu Saha The circular economy – the idea of “reduce, reuse and recycle” – has…
Key policies for the energy transition Mark Diesendorf The federal government has released its 2035 greenhouse gas emissions target. However, more important than the target…
Failures in privatised care starkly illustrate the inevitable failure of neoliberalism Geoff Davies The failures of privatised child care and aged care have starkly illustrated…
From public good to corporate enterprise: The financialisation of universities- (Part I) John H Howard In recent months, Australian universities have been increasingly scrutinized over…
The heart of mainstream economics Jim Byrne You need assumptions to build useful economic models – but those assumptions should not influence the results. I…
Are business schools priming students for a world that no longer exists? Carla Liuzzo and Mimi Tsai Endless economic expansion isn’t sustainable. Scientists are telling…
The Road Not Taken Lars Syll Had the whole discipline catastrophically misunderstood Keynes’ deeply revolutionary ideas? We heterodox economists, who have chosen the road less…
The hidden cost of rate hikes Darren Quinn When the Reserve Bank of Australia raises interest rates, it’s presented as a necessary, technical adjustment to…
Open Letter to Ministers of Finance, Central Bank Governors, Governors and Alternate Governors of the World Bank Group and International Monetary Fund, and Leaders of…
Financial markets cannot punish a sovereign government. Here’s why Steven Hail, Stephanie Kelton and Darren Quinn What the UK Mini-Budget Really Proved “You’ve got to…
Press conferences at Parliament House, our 2025 Revenue Summit, Senate Committee hearings and several media interviews, October was a busy month for The Australia Institute.