In 2006, James C. Ho wrote an article titled āDefining āAmericanā: Birthright Citizenship and the Original Understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment.ā Since his appointment to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2018, his article has gained greater attention and authority than it otherwise might have done. Judge Ho was nominated by President Trump as an adherent of original intent jurisprudence, and the presidentās confidence in Judge Hoās fidelity to the Constitution seems to have been amply borne out by some of his early opinions. In one concurring opinion, he wrote that āit is hard to imagine a better example of how far we have strayed from the text and original understanding of the Constitution than this case.ā
āText and original understandingā are, indeed, the reliable touchstones of constitutional jurisprudence. But Judge Ho did not live up to those standards in his attempt to uncover the meaning of the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment, even as he has recently indicated he understands the high stakes involved. He did write that āunder our Constitution, the people are not subjects, but citizens.ā While Judge Ho provides no acknowledgment, this is a close paraphrase of a statement made by signer of the Declaration and the Constitution and Supreme Court Justice James Wilson quoted in chapter two. āUnder the Constitution of the United States,ā Wilson wrote in 1793, in the case of Chisolm v. Georgia, āthere are citizens, but no subjects.ā
The 2025 IMF & World Bank Spring Meetings showed the system is broken.
Our movements are fighting back ā stronger, louder, unstoppable.
1. Bretton Woods is Broken: People Demand Justice, Not Austerity




